Talk:Silverlink

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Silverlink service between Stratford and Richmond is extremely overcrowded during rush hours. The service only ever uses three carriages and because of their design and the station platform design it becomes very difficult for passenger to disembark from the train in a timely manner. Equally difficult for new passengers to board the train. Also, poor carriage design fails to encourage passegers to not cause obstruction. For example, there are very few places to hold-on for shorter passengers (gennerally women) while standing, so obstructions occur around the doorways. This poor passenger flow causes dalays, and outright conflicts between passengers on a daily basis. SilverLink resolves these delays by cancelling trains which are negatively impacting the schedule of the next train. Worsening the overcrowding, but maintaining good statistics for time-table performance. There was one occassion (at Kew Gardens station) when this was attempted, but passengers refused to dis-embark. Police were called to resolve the situation.

Silverlink staff say that the reason they only ever have three carriages per train is because there are some station platforms that are too short to support the use of more carriages. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.171.209.250 (talk) 09:58, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
See also: WikiProject Trains to do list

Start

This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. (assessment comments)

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale within the Trains WikiProject.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject UK Railways.

Out of curiosity, why does this article not make any mention of the fact that Silverlink used to run to Birmingham, but for some unknown reason decided to only run to Northampton. This article seems to be rather biased to the London end of things, and has very little about what goes on up north. Does anyone know what will happen to the London - Northampton - Birmingham services when Silverlink and Central Trains are broken up perchance? G-Man * 20:28, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

Stopping running between Northampton and Birmingham was a SRA decision. Current plans from the DfT for the later part of this decade call for an hourly Desiro service up the Trent Valley running Euston - Northampton - Crewe (and possibly some to Liverpool). -- Arwel (talk) 00:17, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Silverlink Metro

I commented out some editorialising about the performance of S Metro. If it is is to go back, it needs to have a reference to an independent source. The Evening Standard would do if there is nothing better. --Concrete Cowboy 23:45, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Quite right. I would like to vent steam at Sliverlink too but Wikipedia is not the place to do it. What I find interesting (as somebody who has only been using Silverlink for a 3 years) is to read the Barking to Gospel Oak user group's history page in which they describe the current Silverlink service as a significant improvement on the almost even worse service in the later years of BR. That flatly contradicts the claims made in the text you removed. If people want to reference bad things said about the Silverlink services which are actually true then they should check out the GLA report into their services. That didn't pull any punches. --DanielRigal 10:30, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Silverlink (recording artist)

Removed from start of article:

it may not be important to whoever is deleting information of this page, but is is a fact that there is more than one meaning of Silverlink, this page is named silverlink not silverlink trains. please leave this information as the whole point of this site is the spreading of information not deleting it.

Silverlink is a recording artist, remixer and dj. he has recently remixed Lily Allen, he has also remixed Klaxons under the title of Third eye mafia {with Matthew wowow}. Silverlink

Section has been removed as it is (almost) entirely unrelated to this article.

IT IS NOTHING PERSONAL!

If "Silverlink" is notable enough to be included in Wikipedia, then please create an article for him. But please bear in mind that his article will need to be named Silverlink (recording artist), or similar, as this article ("Silverlink", ie about the train company):

(a) was here first (by a long way!)

(b) has hundreds of pages pointing to it (a name change would require a lot of work) and

Also, if Mr Silverlink does qualify for his own page, there will be absolutely no problem about including a 'Disambiguation' link to his article at the top of this one. That's how WP works.

Please do not add this information to this page again, as it will be considered vandalism and removed.

Note for other editors: Googling for 'Silverlink' produced only three hits (in the first 60) related to this remixer: his MySpace page (which I could not accesss), a radio station (that had no information about him), and the above link.

EdJogg 16:05, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Silverlink logo.gif

Image:Silverlink logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:27, 6 June 2007 (UTC)