Talk:Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the Colombian WikiProject. This project provides a central approach to Colombia-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards. Click here and join us!. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information) | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ] | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale for WikiProject Mountains. | |
| If you have rated this article please consider adding assessment comments. | ||
as stated at http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=delete&page=Image:Sierrasantamarta.jpg
[edit] Access problems
I think that the knowledge of these is general enough for them not to need citation. If it is not, then loads of material on Wikipedia would need similar citation. I propose to revert the "citation needed" tag unless there is any objection. Viewfinder 02:49, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- Them? who are them? W:NPOV, prove that the information there is true, how do I know whoever wrote that isn't making it up just for the sake? general enough? what happened to neutrality? --F3rn4nd0
05:43, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
I added a citation. I have the specific information about the north and south access problems from the same author, but I do not know if he has published this detail, so if you insist on deleting it then I probably cannot stop you. But I think that such a deletion would be unnecessary. The attitude of the local tribes and the problems of the drug conflict are well known. Viewfinder 06:03, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Proposed merge
Currently, Pico Simón Bolívar is a microstub, and contradicts Pico Cristóbal Colón. Should it be merged into here? Should the two peaks be merged into one article instead? Should both peaks be merged into here? -- Spireguy 22:36, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Yes, I think so. I see no need for separate articles. Viewfinder 20:56, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
I agree, there is little info about the peak, not even a picture to actually describe it.. --F3rn4nd0 (Roger - Out) 17:41, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
I agree too. It'd be a good idea, at least, until there's enough info for the other two articles to become sufficient on their own. --Fbolanos (talk) 18:26, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
