Wikipedia talk:Sidestacking and pinching
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Irony
Needs an image for extra sidestacky/pinchy goodness. :) Zetawoof(ζ) 19:28, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
- There's nothing wrong with having this page, but I suggest not cluttering up articles with a useless tag, specific to this. If an article has a problem, please fix it. If you can't fix it yourself, please state the problem on the talk page. There's different style issues, and we shouldn't have tags for each. It's more important articles should have proper spelling, but we don't (I hope) have a {{bad spelling}} tag. Also the word "policy" has a specific meaning in Wikipedia, and doesn't apply to style guidelines. I don't mind if you change it to a guideline, but don't call it a policy. --Rob 04:50, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Example?
 |
Please help improve this article or section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion. (April 2007) |
An illustratory example would be extremely helpful. -- Beland 19:40, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] An example
 Image for the infobox |
|
| Space filler: | Suspendisse potenti. Vivamus pharetra, nunc at faucibus aliquet, nibh tellus adipiscing risus, non fermentum est purus quis nisi. Nunc ornare dui eget quam. Suspendisse potenti. Morbi metus. Aenean scelerisque, dui id vehicula auctor, erat sapien laoreet metus, facilisis cursus nisl enim vel pede. Suspendisse ullamcorper, justo nec tincidunt aliquet, nisl dui dignissim turpis, condimentum convallis massa risus at ligula. Cras sollicitudin, neque sed cursus placerat, purus nisl nonummy turpis, nec posuere ante neque ut metus. Nulla augue. Fusce mollis. Nulla velit leo, congue nec, egestas sed, dapibus sit amet, neque. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus. Donec eget nibh. Sed ac enim. Cras euismod condimentum augue. In semper porttitor risus. Aliquam commodo. Duis dictum, augue in lacinia placerat, velit nunc tempus velit, in commodo enim diam sagittis dolor. Ut accumsan. |
|---|---|
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
 |
The neutrality of this article is disputed, or some sort of nonsense like that |
Ut laoreet arcu quis risus suscipit sollicitudin. Integer ornare. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Sed felis. Aliquam ornare. Maecenas faucibus felis a neque. Proin a leo vitae leo tincidunt molestie. Phasellus fermentum turpis ac diam adipiscing porta. Aenean non nibh sit amet turpis iaculis aliquam. Sed nec arcu sed justo aliquet ornare. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Mauris elit felis, convallis eu, egestas quis, luctus a, mi. Integer vulputate commodo neque. Maecenas massa. Integer interdum eros at lorem. Duis in metus ac mi varius semper. Mauris egestas aliquam mauris. Morbi lacus pede, tincidunt ut, vehicula venenatis, auctor sit amet, pede.
Quisque id pede nec dolor tincidunt pharetra. Cras ipsum orci, vulputate in, elementum quis, tempus at, mauris. Sed vehicula commodo purus. Nunc dapibus mauris sed magna. Vivamus urna leo, pretium a, mattis in, convallis ut, justo. Suspendisse sed leo iaculis nunc faucibus hendrerit. Cras suscipit. Praesent egestas porta ligula. Nullam erat. Quisque dignissim arcu a quam. Nam condimentum auctor ipsum. Duis et arcu. Vivamus fermentum arcu nec ipsum. Ut bibendum consectetuer magna. Praesent vestibulum ullamcorper urna. Pellentesque dapibus, neque at nonummy eleifend, enim tellus ullamcorper mi, id laoreet dui erat vel orci. Nullam laoreet fringilla sapien. Donec hendrerit arcu et leo.
Sadly, this isn't all that uncommon a phenomenon. As soon as an article starts including more than a few images, especially in close proximity to infoboxes, it's easy for the many floated objects to start colliding with each other. Full-width templates like {{npov}} are serious offenders as well. Zetawoof(ζ) 21:35, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Looking within
This essay is a bit confusing, a glance at Wikipedia:Sidestacking and pinching appears to be pretty much just a big box on the side... — xaosflux Talk 23:03, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
- That's the point. It looks bad; an illustration here speaks louder than any words could. (Not to mention the loveliness above. Crystallina 00:59, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
