Talk:Shuttle Landing Facility
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions. | ||||||||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. | ||||||||
|
|||||||||
 |
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Florida; If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ. | ||||||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) | ||||||
| ??? | This article has not yet been prioritized. | ||||||
|
|||||||
Contents |
[edit] Merger
I would suggest that, per Naming Conventions, we merge NASA Shuttle Landing Facility into Shuttle Landing Facility rather than the other way around. - more common usage, unneccisary disambiguation --GW_Simulations|User Page | Talk | Contribs | E-mail 19:26, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
- I redirected the Shuttle Landing Facility page into the NASA Shuttle Landing Facility page, so we don't need a merge. Bigtop 19:14, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was no move, since there seems to be no particular clamour for it and the current title is unambiguous. Guy 08:48, 13 September 2006 (UTC) NASA Shuttle Landing Facility → Shuttle Landing Facility – (Over redirect with history)Simple WP:NC, it is called Shuttle Landing Facility, and most commonly reffered to as this. GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 22:01, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Survey
Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
[edit] Discussion
Add any additional comments
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was PAGE MOVED per reasonable and well-argued request, previous request was unopposed. If somebody objects, let them say so and we can talk about it then. -GTBacchus(talk) 00:24, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Requested move
NASA Shuttle Landing Facility → Shuttle Landing Facility — WP:NC states that the most common form should be used. This is clearly Shuttle Landing Facility not NASA Shuttle Landing Facility. If you look at the pages that link here, then, excluding those that link through , most link to Shuttle Landing Facility. A quick Google search confirms this - 655 results for the phrase NASA shuttle landing facility [1] vs 92,100 for shuttle landing facility[2]. Sadly, Shuttle Landing Facility has a history, so I cannot move this myself. Note: my last request for this move was unopposed, however it was never implemented. GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 20:47, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Survey
- Add * '''Support''' or * '''Oppose''' on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
[edit] Discussion
- Add any additional comments:
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit] Question About Shuttles
How do they get the shuttles back to KSC? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.16.151.77 (talk) 20:45, 10 May 2007 (UTC).
[edit] Runway naming
Isn't it a bit strange that the runway is 15 and 33? shouldn't it be 15 and 30-31, or 16-17 and 33? 09:34, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
- What is strange about it? The runway is aligned northwest/southeast (330 degrees northwest/150 degrees southeast). Fl295 18:58, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
