Talk:Shtokman field

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Energy Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, which collaborates on articles related to energy .

This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale.

Mid

This article is on a subject of mid importance within energy.

Help with this template

This article has been rated but has no comments. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

A story relating to the article Shtokman field (or a previous version of it) was included in the news section of the Energy Portal. Please consider updating the portal news with any major developments on this topic.

As both names--Stockman and Russian transcription Shtokman--are in use, the article probably has to refer to both. Beagel 22:41, 9 September 2006

I'm based in Moscow and work as a journalist in the Oil and Gas Industry, and I've never seen the transliteration 'Stockman' used. 'Shtokman' is the standard and I would argue it's the only one that should be used on this page. Proletarskaya 11.11 Moscow time 18 August 2007

C'mon, just try "Stockman field" by Google search. Quite commonly used. Beagel 08:10, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Any idea after whom the field was named? Name sounds bit like Russian version of German name (Stockmann) --Mikko Paananen 20:16, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Can'to say for sure, but Russians have a research vessel "Professor Shtokman". Also, there are seveal quite famous Russians by name Shtokman (or Stockman or Stockmann). Beagel 17:40, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

There is presently no approved plan for development and operation of the Shtokman discovery. Hence, the proper term for the discovery is "technical resources", or simply "resources" and not "reserves", as is says now. 62.92.82.10 08:22, 4 April 2007 (UTC)