User talk:shoeofdeath
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Revert
U R welcome. Weird. I thought he'd come after me for deleting the trash he put up. Oh, well. you never know. Dlohcierekim 04:30, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fatherhood Dreams
Why did you delete the page? What copyright infringement?
ha?
boris —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.174.89.134 (talk) 04:20, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- The text of the article appeared to be copy-pasted from www.fatherhooddreams.com, and no assertion of permission was present. Please see Wikipedia:Copyrights for more info. shoeofdeath 04:40, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
I am new to Wikipedia. I wrote both Fatherhood Dreams website and Wikipedia stuff. It's my words so please put the site back up. If you need me to do anything, let me know. It would've been easier for you to send me a message before erasing the site if you had any issues. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fatherhooddreams (talk • contribs) 19:07, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- I have restored the article, but keep in mind it may still be deleted if it is not found to satisfy notability requirements. shoeofdeath 19:30, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Russell D. Longcore article, deleted 21 Mar 08
Dear Sir:
How dare you delete the article about me? I got no comment from you, no discussion, nothing. I will most certainly make a complaint against you and request arbitration of some other form of redress.
Russell Longcore65.12.169.113 (talk) 14:52, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
- Hi Russell, since the article about you was previously deleted in an Articles for Deletion discussion it qualifies for deletion immediately (see the links in the deletion summary). If you wish to appeal the decision you should take it to Wikipedia:Deletion review. I would also encourage you or your publishers to read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and Wikipedia:Autobiography. shoeofdeath 15:35, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Dan Rosenberg deletion????
How can you delete a page with no warning or notice? Please explain. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.225.202.10 (talk) 19:15, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
- The content in the recently created article about him did not differ significantly from the article that was deleted at AfD, which is why it was speedy deleted. I see that you have already brought this to Deletion Review, so we will see what others think on the matter. Remember that simply being an actual person does not qualify someone to have an encyclopedia article about them, and that individuals need to satisfy notability criteria in order to stay on Wikipedia. shoeofdeath 22:21, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] I can't believe it
Special:Contributions/Brachman (edit: and some more). How did you notice? – sgeureka t•c 07:34, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
- And I see you marked User:PaxJudaeana as a sockpuppet but didn't block him or anything, although he was still editing last week. Were you unsure about your conclusion, or aren't you comfortable with your admin tools yet? (I just want to know whether I can approach you and not necessarily Kusma in such matters from now on.) – sgeureka t•c 07:43, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
-
- Hey there, it's been awhile. I was thinking of posting something over at WT:SU about this anyway. So, in addition to Brachman, I stumbled upon Special:Contributions/Maddaey, Special:Contributions/Draghi, Special:Contributions/Voelgyi, and Special:Contributions/PaxJudaeana the other day while looking at some of his old pages (none of which would have been caught on Special:RecentChangesLinked/Wikipedia:SU, maybe that was intentional). I tagged and blocked the last two (what made you think I didn't block PaxJudeana?) because he used those more than once and because they were active relatively recently. My guess is that there are probably more socks I missed, but I'm not sure.
- I haven't started cleaning up anything yet, and I haven't decided how much of it to delete per g5. With the surname pages especially, I have no real motivation to start cleaning them up like before. So, if you have some time, maybe you could quickly scan through the contribs pages above and see if there are any articles you want to give the old "cleanup per WP:SU" treatment to : p. Otherwise I will probably get rid of most of the surname pages (now with new bizarre format of putting the template at the top) and fix the bio pages myself. As for your last question, you can definitely come to me with this stuff in the future (although I will probably be inactive over the summer again). Also feel free to ask if you need any sort of admin help, SU-related or not. shoeofdeath 22:01, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- Thank you. what made you think I didn't block PaxJudeana? - I accidently checked whom PaxJudaeana blocked, not who blocked PaxJudaeana. I am pretty sure I'll look over at least the surname pages in the sockpuppets' contributions. – sgeureka t•c 20:07, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
-
[edit] Others
I'm really angry towards you!!!! Why did you delete the question about why Nick Rhodes was in South Park movie????
--81.228.158.173 (talk) 13:08, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- It would seem so. Unfortunately I have absolutely no idea what this person is talking about. The Nick Rhodes article, which I have never edited, does indeed mention that he was in the South Park movie, although I should probably delete this now as uncited trivia. shoeofdeath 17:26, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
-
[edit] Top Importance Chicago Articles
If you want to help me choose Category:Top-importance Chicago articles, come comment at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Chicago/Assessment#Current_Top-importance_Candidates by June 5th.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 14:14, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

