Talk:Shout at the Devil

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
B This article has been rated as B-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

The following comments were left by the quality and importance raters: (edit · refresh)

Article requirements:
YesY All the start class criteria
YesY A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details
YesY At least one section of prose (excluding the lead section)
YesY A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs
YesY A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians
YesY Categorisation at least by artist and year
YesY A casual reader should learn something about the album. Andrzejbanas (talk) 08:40, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
Authenticity check: A search reveals that the phrase "regarded by many" appears in the text. Is the phrase a symptom of a dubious statement? Could a source be quoted instead? Perhaps the "many" could be identified? Might text be edited to more genuinely reflect specific facts?
Wetman


The cover with the pentogram in black is actually the original cover that then went on to be used as the remastered cover, the one with there faces on the cover is of a later release

Contents

[edit] Song Trivia

I'm getting real tired of reading an article and in the middle of it I find that a given song is featured on the Guitar player II video game. That information isn't all that important, but if it has to be included, let it be at the end of the article page instead of damn-smack in the middle. Darwin's Bulldog 22:41, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Most influential?

'...one of the most influential of its genre.' Are you kidding??? What genre? Heavy Metal? That sure ain't Heavy Metal...

They sure are !!!! --NRS | T/M\B 13:57, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

First, please remember to sign your name when making any comments on this page. Second, what does it matter? This isn't a message board for opinions, it's meant for suggestions on how to better the article.Cobra wwe 03:59, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Oh fuck off about Mötley Crüe being a heavy metal band. Heavy metal bands doesn't look like retarded girls, they don't play music this painfully stupid (Judas Priest excluded, but that's just camp) and doesn't sound so... Lightweight. I usually refer to hair metal/glam metal/brutal death metal/whatever you guys call this to as "Stupid shit-rock performed by clowns who think that they're hardcore, but that would maybe be considered too much opinions to suit Wikipedia. Glam metal is a fine term for this shit.

And to cite Dave Mustaine (who shreds the fucking asses of these losers): "Glam stands for "Gay Los Angeles Metal"."--85.224.82.71 (talk) 15:43, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Removed POV

I reworded the beginning paragraphs that had originally contained the regarded by many lines that someone at the top of this page has mentioned. The beginning is an easier read now, and doesn't contain vage statements. Darwin's Bulldog 21:14, 3 December 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:ShoutattheDevilCD2.jpg

I blanked the warning as new FUR template now completed at album cover photo page. Best, A Sniper 15:15, 26 November 2007 (UTC)