Talk:Shoe fetishism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as start-class on the quality scale. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
 |
This article is within the scope of the Fashion WikiProject. Please work to improve this article, or visit our project page to find other ways of helping. Thanks! |
||
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale. |
||
| Low | This article is on a subject of low-importance within fashion. | ||
|
Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
|||
 Archives |
| 2006-2007 |
[edit] Shoeplay redirects here - yet no mention of it
Why does shoeplay redirect here? This article doesn't mention shoeplay (which is not always sexual) atall. As I recall there was a shoeplay article (and quite a good one as well), but evidently a redirect happened - and as far as I can see without any discussion prior to the redirect http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shoeplay&action=history (It appears to have been deleted without anyone attempting to add in sources - lack of edits up to redirection)And as far as I can tell there was no community discussion on the redirect - if there was and someone could point me to the archive of it i'd be grateful. 81.79.73.71 20:08, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Shoeplay was redirected here for being unsourced, and for being original research. Those are good reasons. Anyone wanting to add information about "non-sexual" shoeplay will need to cite a reference. / edg ☺ ★ 21:04, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
