Talk:Shibui

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a project to improve all Japan-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Japan-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Socrates This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating on the importance scale.

[edit] Sources

Can you get any sources that show that 渋い is an aesthetic, and not just a broad adjective? This is very similar to the problem that we have with the kawaii article.  freshofftheufoΓΛĿЌ  13:41, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Both the Kodansha Encyclopedia of Japan and Louis Frederic's "Japan Encyclopedia" have entries on 渋い, describing it as an aesthetic and an important element of artistic and cultural history. Neither of these texts tend to include Japanese terms that translate directly into English; they focus only on those unique to Japanese culture which require some further explanation. I'd understand if you'd like to see some more academic scholarly sources that aren't encyclopedias; I just don't happen to have those sources in front of me right now. LordAmeth 15:06, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
No problem, I guess I'll have to pick me up a copy of Kodansha myself one of these days. A specific reference to the American magazine you stated would be perfect, though as it's pretty old that might be difficult. Forgive me for questioning the integrity of your article, though it's becoming more and more necessary to do so recently.  freshofftheufoΓΛĿЌ  06:14, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
No need to apologize. I understand... it is truly a fine line between what's encyclopedia and what's just dictionary material. LordAmeth 12:26, 1 July 2006 (UTC)