User talk:Sheepeh

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome!!
Welcome!!

Hello, Sheepeh, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message. --Ed ¿Cómo estás? 02:54, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] help wanted

I need your help. I am a new member of wikipeida. I find the article of "Tibet" or "history of tibet" in wikipeida is very biased towards pro-independent Tibetans. I have strong evidence to prove what I said. I made some edit and added some important facts. However, they are deleted. The problem is: I am not familiar with the rules of wikipeida and I probable won't have time to get familiar with it. So, I need your help so that truth can be known by people. You can find my deleted versions in the history of that topic. The main source of my information is in the following. This is probably the most complete and detailed information source on the Tibet issue. But it is not listed in the reference list of Tibet page yet. I remember the content of this website is from Chinese government’s white paper on Tibet issue. If you go to the official website of Tibetan in exiles, you will find that although they are very unhappy with these information. They could not point out any major problems about these facts. It would be better if you can have a quick look of this website and add whatever information you want.

"The historical status of tibet", by China internet information center. It cab be found at the website of:

www.china.org.cn/ch-xizang/tibet/historical_status/english/index.html

www.china.org.cn/ch-xizang/tibet/indexE.html


Many thanks.

Xiaoliang1 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.38.139.64 (talk) 01:26, 2 April 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Mooooo

I'm going to disagree with you here. "You have two cows" is a parody of an economic metaphor, not a funny ha-ha joke. The three examples up there demonstrate this sufficiently. Also, I linked to Uncyclopedia's page with over a thousand "You have two cows" funny ha-ha ones.

Perhaps one example of a silly one would serve to represent those. I say, add one funny one, and label it as such. Pick a classic one. Surrealism perhaps? --DevastatorIIC 19:46, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Come to think of it, I guess I'm not disagreeing. --DevastatorIIC 21:31, 13 April 2007 (UTC)


Ok :p