User talk:Shark Fin 101
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Happy Editing!!!
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks and happy editing, Alphax τεχ 01:32, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
- Ummm.. Thanks? No, thank you. Shark Fin 101 00:14, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] New Project
- I have decided that I will start a major revamp of a wikipedia article. Clean-up will be mandatory on that article and it may be largely rewritten. Check back in a few hours to see what the project is. Shark Fin 101 00:12, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
- Ok.... That was a project forgotten... Still no idea what to do. Hang in there. I'll get to it. Maybe. Eventually. :-) --Shark Fin 101 20:18, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
- Well... I've been busy over in wikicities... been working on the Redwall (book) wiki. So, if anyone reads the Redwall books, I'm sure we would be happy to have you in the community! Link to the Redwall Abbey City! --Shark Fin 101 17:01, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
- Ok.... That was a project forgotten... Still no idea what to do. Hang in there. I'll get to it. Maybe. Eventually. :-) --Shark Fin 101 20:18, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Jenner and HTML
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Edward_Jenner&diff=prev&oldid=133190231 I don't understand from teh comments which HTML you regard as unneeded. If it is that which produces the two boxes, it is there because it produces the effect I wanted, which itself is because there has been much confusion (fostered) about what was done and shown. Lastly, the talk page asserts that there is advice about the rationale for removal fo teh article from the list of good articles, however there isn't - unless your ratehr general remark is it. I similarly can't identify from the page who decided to remove it, can you enlighten me? Midgley 10:21, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
