Talk:Shark Attack 3: Megalodon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Film Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the priority scale.
Editing Guidelines Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article: If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film) For more information see: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films) When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references. Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film. Article upgrading needed: You can help! WP:IA   Stub to Start-Class Upgrading Instructions for Films Note that instructions for articles on other types of film topics within the scope of WikiProject Films are currently under development. To contribute in upgrading this stub article to Start class, the following requirements must be met: Significant intro (list the title, alternate titles, year released, director, actors starring in the film, summary of headings, etc.) Film infobox ({{infobox film}}) Picture: Consult WikiProject Free Images for freely released images from a film shoot, opening, or other relevant free image. Non-free and unlicensed images are to be avoided if at all possible, but if used should include a detailed fair use rationale. (An image is not required for start class if unavailable.) Plot summary Include cast and crew information. At least two other developed sections of information (production, reception (including box office figures), awards and honors, themes, differences from novel or TV show, soundtrack, sequels, DVD release, etc.) Categories (by year, country, language, and genre(s))  Helpful links: WP:BETTER, WP:LEAD, WP:REF, WP:WAF Once this article has fulfilled these requirements, the film can be reassessed to Start class and this template will be removed automatically.
Additional Information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no

	This article, category, or template is part of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to horror film and fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale.

What line? cyclosarin 03:21, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

"...what do you say I take you home and eat your p***y..." 210.7.4.48 12:13, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] rewrite

I'm gonna start rewriting this. It's written in a terrible manner, and more than half the article is original research and unsourced. DurinsBane87 04:54, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

This is hilarious, it almost makes me want to go out and hire the movie lol ..

219.89.9.29 07:32, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

How could it not be original research? Isn't the idea of movies to watch them yourselves to find out what happens? Are you sugessting that only someone who hasn't watched the movie can write the article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.228.26.221 (talk) 18:48, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

I was actually refering to the half a page at the bottom that was talking about why the editor who wrote the article liked it so much. I removed most if not all of that.DurinsBane87 19:00, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

And why is the above-mentioned line (nor the sex scene that follows it for that matter) mentioned in the article? It is, after all, probably the most famous thing about this movie, and I don't see how you can write a detailed plot summary without the love interest anyway. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.228.26.221 (talk) 18:55, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

I can't add to the plot because I haven't seen it, I merely cut away all the shit that didnt belong. The line itself doesn't get mention because your claim that it's the most famous part of the movie is unproven. DurinsBane87 19:00, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

I could be wrong about this, but according to Barrowman's autobiography, Anything Goes, the line in actual fact is not "eat your p****" but instead "watch 'I Love Lucy'". Could be wrong... QuietusExtraho (talk) 18:25, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Have you seen the movie? He says it. The original line was different, Barrowman ad-libbed it. Barrowman also speaks about the line in his recent appearance on Al Murray's Happy Hour. AtaruMoroboshi (talk) 18:30, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Haven't seen it, hence why I said I could be wrong. But I apologise. I knew he ad-libbed it, but it was meant to be removed with ADR, they kept it in. It was the TV version that he had to dub over for it, and hence said "Watch, 'I Love Lucy'". QuietusExtraho (talk) 23:34, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

May be right. I recall hearing something about it. If it's in his bio, and can be sourced, this information could be added to the article, but it seems slightly trivial. You'd have to find a way to adequately integrate it with the article. AtaruMoroboshi (talk) 23:38, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

It is rather trivial and, looking through the article, I can't see anywhere, that it would fit without bringing the quality of the article down. I was enquiring because of the mentions of the line within the article itself. QuietusExtraho (talk) 16:01, 16 April 2008 (UTC)