User talk:Seanr451

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If you've come here to be an ass, feel free. Just don't be offended if I return the favor on your talk page. Seanr451

Contents

[edit] I do not vandalize pages.

Just because you don't like the alterations that I may have done to your favorite page does not make me a vandal. It means I disagree with you. Please remember that Wikipedia is a community project, not just your project. Wikipedia's official policy states that I have just as much right to edit a page as you do. If you're here to place a "Do not Vandalize the Wikipedia" warning on my talk page don't. Whatever I did, I did it in the belief that I was following Wikipedia's guidelines. If you believe that I'm wrong then feel free to place a comment here and be intelligent enough to explain exactly what I did wrong. Don't be a fucking retard like some of the Wikipedian's in the past who've accused me of being a vandal simply because I SPELLCHECKED their favorite page. Seanr451 21:13, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Traveller Wiki a go

We have permission from Marc Miller to put the library information on the traveller wiki at wikicities -Dan Dcorrin 02:35, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Comments

If you're here to past more hateful nonsense because you don't like what I wrote on the Islam article talk page, please post it on the appropriate talk page. And please realise that just because you and I disagree doesn't mean that what I post is vandalism. It just means that you and I disagree. In a free and civilized country people are allowed to disagree.

I don't believe that all Muslims are terrorists. And I'm sure that not all Muslims believe that I am an infidel that deserves only death. Please prove me right by dealing with me in a civilized manner. Seanr451 11:30, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Mate, I'm totally with you on the Islamic terrorists section - they are trying to prevent even a mention. Just make sure your section is a summary of Islamic extremist terrorism, and they can't complain. Or at least, the admins can't complain. You're right, Islam is completely biased towards believing Muslims. Thank you for being on the case.Dev920 17:25, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

The Islamic Wikipedians are complete "bury their heads in the sand" idiots. I place a single link on the Islam page linking Islam to the Islamic Terrorist page and they accuse me of vandalism. Just what world do they live in that there are no such thing as Islamic Terrorists? It isn't the world that I live in. But whatever. I'm not going to fight with them over it. It's not worth it to me, and even though I'm right (probably especially because I'm right) I'd probably just get banned from Wikipedia because I'm sure that at least one of the high-and-mighty Islamic Wikipedian's is probably sucking some Admin's dick. So yes, that means they win. I'm tired of fighting with idiots on the internet and I'm just not going to do it anymore. Seanr451 21:13, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Given that Irishpunktom and Raphael have just been taken to Arbitration, and they are finally losing their battle over the Muslim Guilds (Timothy Usher is the driving force behind it), I don't think that there is reason to give up just yet. Quite frankly, mentioning Islamic terrorism on the Islam page is completely reasonable, and any RfC will come down in our favour. "Evil happens when the good do nothing". Fight on. Dev920 21:24, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

I have added a section on Islamic terrorism. I suspect this may turn out to be quite controversial, which is a pity but such fights cannot be avoided. Your support if it does would be appreciated, particularly if it comes down to who has more people to get around 3RR. Dev920 14:27, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] White Christian Terrorism

Please don't post 1,000 lines of information on my talk page. Especially stuff that's completely unrelated to the topic. Just because other people have been terrorists doesn't change the fact that muslims have been terrorists, and it should be mentioned. Seanr451 00:29, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] List of unofficial GURPS books

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Kusma (討論) 23:23, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

You are allowed to remove prods, but then it may move to AfD, where it will be debated, with and AfD tag placed on the article. It is not to be removed until the debate is finished.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 06:26, 9 June 2006 (UTC)


Please look at the two templates carefully

  • PROD template {{prod}}
  • AFD template {{AfD}}

Prod is for uncontested deletion. If you remove the prod then there is someone objecting to deletion, then the AFD is used, which triggers a debate, which cannot be cancelled by someone objecting to the debate. I have reinstated the tag because it is AfD. Please read the text on it careflly. Regards, Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 06:40, 9 June 2006 (UTC).

Please make your case at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of unofficial GURPS books, that is now the central place to object to deletion of your article. The explanation above about which tags can and can't be removed is correct. Kusma (討論) 13:38, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Please read the notes I placed with my opinion on the AfD page. Wikipedia isn't the place for the list, but I have made suggestions as to what to do with it. Cheers. — Estarriol talk 09:55, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Contacting Seanr451

Hey Seanr451, I didn't know where else to put this. BluWiki is back up. See you there! --Nerdvana 14:08, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:GTIWcover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:GTIWcover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:57, 9 September 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cover-sm.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cover-sm.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:33, 13 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ImperiumMap.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ImperiumMap.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:47, 13 February 2008 (UTC)