Talk:Scream trilogy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Tags
Unreferenced: there are no references. Clean up: this article is a mess. Compare with more mature articles such as Halloween (film series) and A Nightmare on Elm Street (series). Neither are perfect but both are much better than this fragmented mess. It looks like a scrapbook. The JPStalk to me 15:18, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:B00004W20F.01. AA240 SCLZZZZZZZ .jpg
Image:B00004W20F.01. AA240 SCLZZZZZZZ .jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:37, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] the rules
a thoery me and freinds, and peopel on internet, since this is a dead talk anyway,s is that the character sheilds, in other words non important characters, take the place of main characters to die, say, leaving and saying the i be back line, a minor character will die at that point for some reason, ussualy more.
Agreed?--Jakezing (talk) 03:36, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- Ok, I argue this addition on the "Exceptions" area:
"In "Scream 3," Roman Bridger is not superhuman, as one head shot is enough to kill him. However, he was stabbed multiple times earlier in the film, surviving due to a bulletproof vest he wore, a fact which he revealed to Sydney before his last attempt to kill her, which ended when he was shot in the head."
- The whole superhuman does apply metaphorically, because of the bullet proof vest that he wore (no other killer did this) he was technically superhuman, they just found a way around that. Does everyone agree that this "Exception" to the rule be removed? C. Pineda (クリス) (talk) 03:27, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

