Talk:Scratch and Grounder

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Scratch and Grounder article.

Article policies

This article is within the scope of the The Sega Project, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Sega products. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article is on a subject of low priority within The Sega Project
This article is supported by the Sonic task force.


[edit] in the end?

Whatever became of these two in the end of it all?

Umm, they probably got hit by an extremly powerful Tomahawk missle and were never seen again.

If we're talking the comic, probably went up with Robotropolis when it got nuked.

It got nuked? I never read the comic, but I watched AoStH and I made the Tomahawk missile thing up.

I miss them, they were two of the best Sonic characters I've ever known.

I miss them too, especially Grounder. Aosth was a good show.

They will be remembered forever by me, or anyone else thats been a big fan of them.

sign your comments, guys. Most of the old Badniks went on an island that Robotnik designed so they could get repaired. A recent comic had Sonic go to that island and fight Pseudo Sonic, so its not too inconceivable that they are there too. Mavrickindigo 00:05, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Am i the only person that thinks Scratch and Grounder should have seperate articles? I mean, if Coconuts has his own article, why not Scratch and Grounder? Steg Blob 10:58, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

It's because Coconuts isn't grouped together like Scratch and Grounder are. Also, Coconuts competed with Scratch and Grounder most of the time when trying to get Sonic for Dr. Robotnik. Haferro (talk) 00:18, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

For those asking where they are now, they're slated to return in issue 187. Here's the cover; http://archie-blogs.archiecomics.com/sonic/2008/01/archie_comics_shipping_april_2_1.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tonberry2k (talkcontribs) 06:55, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:C-aosth2.jpg

Image:C-aosth2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:48, 12 February 2008 (UTC)