Talk:Scooby-Doo 2: Monsters Unleashed
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Why doesn't Scooby Doo eat any scooby snacks in this movie?
Contents |
[edit] Needs
The article needs the following information/sections (with links to the Style guidelines for film articles)
[edit] Background/Production
It gives background information:
| “ | Included here should be a history of the film's background and development, such as how many studios, actors, directors and writers were involved with the project at one point or another. Continuing onto the production of the film, facts such as filming dates, budget figures, any noteworthy titbits (such as delays, reshoots etc.) should be transformed into prose. Comments from the cast and crew are also welcomed. | ” |
see Wikipedia:WikiProject_Films/Style_guidelines
[edit] Reception
| “ | Expanding on the second paragraph of the lead section, you should analyse how the film was received by critics, meaning professional or well-known film reviewers, and not comments from members of the public (for example, quotes from users of Amazon.com and the Internet Movie Database do not count). Websites such as Rotten Tomatoes ([5]) and Metacritic ([6]) collect professional film reviews and calculate a numerical score from them for each film. In the case of what the general public thought of the film, tend towards the expression "money talks" and provide a summary of the film's commercial success, consulting sites such as Box Office Mojo ([7]) and Box Office Guru ([8]). | ” |
see [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Films/Style_guidelines
[edit] Sequel and Prequel
From the two sources cited one gives me an error message and the other doesn't even mention Scooby Doo at all. I hadn't even heard about them until now, any truth to them?
The 'Monsters' section is all messed up, typos and odd sentence structures galore. Lots42 03:36, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Production
This section needs a lot of work; the sentences are incomplete and jumbled, and mix tense. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.167.132.12 (talk) 08:56, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Scooby Doo2 movie.jpg
Image:Scooby Doo2 movie.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:08, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
ISLA FISHER IS INT THIS MOVIE SHE PLAYS SHAGGYS G/F —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.173.187.248 (talk) 00:47, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Wtf?
"The Cotton Candy Glob was made exclusively for the movie, his name taken from the same monster in one of the comic series that appeared in an episode of The New Scooby Doo Movies." ...WTF? "Anonymous" 13 April 2008 17:34 (GMT +01) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.228.241.157 (talk) 15:24, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

