User talk:Scientizzle/Archive 6

---

Directory:
Archives
March 2006 – July 2006 August 2006 – October 2006 November 2006 – April 2007 May 2007 – September 2007 October 2007 – May 2008 May 2008 –
Contents 1 Hi 2 Softblocking 3 Cinco de COTW 4 Bharat Desh 5 Zzzz Oregon COTW 6 thank you 7 Edit in my Article 8 Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi 9 QWERTY: Oregon COTW 10 Re: Hmmm... 11 Superfly03 12 THANK you. 13 Greeting 14 Ohrgan 15 X marks the WPOR COTW spot 16 user nouse4aname

[edit] Hi

Dear, What do you think, Is this article ready to be nominated as a GA on Wikipedia? If not, can you kindly guide me, so that I could take necessary steps. --Asikhi (talk) 10:05, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Softblocking

Please remember to hardblock all Tor and open proxy IPs. I just found a pedophilia trolling sock on a Tor IP that you had softblocked: [1]. I'm not sure if that's just a one-time mistake, or if you've been doing that for a while (if so, perhaps you could go back and fix them). Thanks. Dmcdevit·t 16:48, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Hmmm...I'll go back and look. WP:TOR does, however, state that Jimbo prefers soft blocking for Tor nodes. — Scientizzle 18:38, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Cinco de COTW

Greetings once again from the Collaboration of the Week at WikiProject Oregon. Thank you to those who helped out with the last set of articles. This week we have the lone Stub class article left in the Top importance classification, Flag of Oregon, and by request, Detroit Lake. Help where you can, if you can. To opt out of these messages, leave your name here. Adios. Aboutmovies (talk) 22:09, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Bharat Desh

hi

i saw that you posted comment on my artical, Bharat Desh. why you wanted to delete it.

don't propose to delete it.

Bharatpur —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.236.75.179 (talk) 01:23, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Bharatpur (talk · contribs)

I deleted Bharat Desh because it was clearly not appropriate for an encyclopedia. It was an unsourced attack essay, completely POV original research. — Scientizzle 05:49, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Zzzz Oregon COTW

Howdy ya’ll, time for another Collaboration of the Week from WikiProject Oregon. Last week we improved Flag of Oregon & Detroit Lake, enough I think to move them to Start class, so great job everyone! This week, we have another request in Oregon Ballot Measure 47 and a randomly selected two sentence stub that should be easy to expand enough for a DYK in Wallowa-Whitman National Forest. To opt out of these messages, leave your name here, or click here to make a suggestion. Aboutmovies (talk) 18:46, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] thank you

Thank you for voting in my RfA, which passed with 194 supporting, 9 opposing, and 4 neutral. Your kindness and constructive criticism is very much appreciated. I look forward to using the tools you have granted me to aid the project. I would like to give special thanks to Tim Vickers, Anthony and Acalamari for their nominations. Thank you again, VanTucky

[edit] Edit in my Article

Why you are reverting back the changes in the article under my user. Kamranhg (talk) 22:05, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

It's not your article, and your recent contributions have been disruptive. — Scientizzle 22:07, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi

Thank you very much for your continuous help & support to improve this article. I want this article to be one of the best articles on the Wikipedia, therefore, my dream is to make this article GA and then FA on Wikipedia. Could you possibly guide me that what else can be done to achieve this goal? Thanks & regards,--Asikhi (talk) 09:27, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] QWERTY: Oregon COTW

Hello WikiProject Oregon participants, time for another edition of Collaboration of the Week. Last week we made some great improvements to Wallowa-Whitman National Forest and Oregon Ballot Measure 47 (1996), with a DYK for the forest. Great job everyone! This week we have another stub, George Lemuel Woods, one of only two governor stubs left, and should be an easy job getting it to Start class. Then, in honor of the long weekend, we have our second State Park Article Creation Drive. Lots of red links to turn blue, lots of opportunities for DYKs. Help if you can, even if it is only adding pictures of state parks. To opt out of these messages, leave your name here, or click here to make a suggestion. May the The Schwartz be with you. Aboutmovies (talk) 10:31, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Hmmm...

Hey, I've noticed the same pattern, but was not aware that WP:RFCU existed. Now that I do, I think that it would be a good idea. I've obviously never done one so if you could set it up I would be glad to help link evidence (I'm sure there's plenty) or whatever else you need. I have to sign off now too, but I should be on tomorrow; you know where to find me, hopefully we can put an end to this charade. Thank you! Blackngold29 05:12, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

It would appear that Argyle (well I have to assume it's him) is at it again. I'll keep an eye on him, but do you have any suggestions? Perhaps a WP:RPP if he keeps it up? Blackngold29 01:42, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

That works. I'll let you know if he comes back again. Thanks! Blackngold29 05:44, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

How do you know it's not a "she"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Goldnblack92 (talk • contribs) 21:09, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

blocked this one, too. — Scientizzle 21:36, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

I sense hostility. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Freeargyle (talk • contribs) 19:56, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

He's back again. Link. It would appear he has found you too... Thanks. Blackngold29 20:08, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Blocked. — Scientizzle 20:17, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

I thought he might get the messege, apparently he hasn't yet. Two vandalisms (one, two) have been made to David McCullough recently by users Ryegal and Algrey15; I don't think it's a coincidence that both names are scrambled versions of "Argyle". Thanks. Blackngold29 23:37, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Superfly03

Any reason I can't create the page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spykeprice04 (talk • contribs) 22:27, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

I assume you're refering to my speedy deletion of Superfly03...The page clearly met the criteria for seepdy deletion, as it was a biography about someone of no claimed significance. You are certainly welcome to recreate the page, but you should be familiar with the notability guideline before you do so--an article that can't meet this guideline will surely be deleted again in the future. — Scientizzle 02:33, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] THANK you.

If there's one thing for certain, there is no possible shortage of patients for mental health professionals as long as there are users like that Bullyingsucks2004 nimrod running around. Thanks for protecting the talk page. That guy was at it for a long time and doublessly yucking it up the whole time. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 16:05, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the cookie. — Scientizzle 16:32, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Greeting

Hello there. Good to see you. ForeverSearching (talk) 17:34, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

This is an attempt at good faith outreach. ForeverSearching (talk) 17:35, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Look. Your old account, ESCStudent774441 (talk · contribs), was blocked for good reasons. That you have withdrawn all legal threats means I won't currently block this account. Just go do something constructive and leave the dramatic nonsense. Convince me you're not here for some bizarre attention-whoring lark... — Scientizzle 18:32, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

If I did want to edit, my home IP address has been blocked. You know which one it is. This is my brother in law's computer I use to write to you. I need the IP unblocked to edit from my home system. Whether you unblock my old account is up to you sir. Maybe with this one, I can start fresh without my past misdeeds attached to this account. In any event, God Bless you Scientizzle. I would like your counsel and a greeting on my talk page. ForeverSearching (talk) 19:19, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

All I ask of you sir, is a fair hearing, probation if you will. ForeverSearching (talk) 19:20, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

It's my opinion that you've had your fair share of "fair hearings". I consider your posting history (as ForeverSearching (talk · contribs), ESCStudent774441 (talk · contribs), 68.236.154.131 (talk · contribs), RogueKnight774441 (talk · contribs), & 74.76.203.209 (talk · contribs)) to be largely melodramatic, disingenuous, and unconstructive. Wasn't this a "final appeal" on your behalf? Haven't you "retired" over & over? You even wrote today, in your slew of talk page postings that you are (yet again) "resign[ing] from Wikipedia"[2] and your "[r]esignation [is] now in effect]"[3]. So which is it? Are you actually resigning? (Never mind the obvious fact that claims of "retirement" in the wake of repeated blocks is entirely fatuous. I see no reason for a "fresh start"--and certainly nothing done to earn such a consideration.)

The only reason I haven't yet blocked is that you actually withdrew all the legal bull you previously spread around. That you repeatedly moved accounts & IPs to evade several fully-justified blocks doesn't win you any points. (I note that this account was created on the same day as RogueKnight774441 and this message.)

Here's my offer, assuming you're not really retiring:

• You disclose, here or at User talk:ForeverSearching, any other accounts you've created to circumvent your prior ban.
• I'll unblock your home IP and leave a note on User:ForeverSearching that it is an alternate acount of ESCStudent774441 with an administrator's "last chance" approval. You will, in good-faith, edit only with the ForeverSearching account (accidental IP logouts, of course, are OK).
• You'll actually be a productive editor, improving articles (try this one, it needs help) and following the rules, and steer clear of off-topic talkpage banter. Wikipedia is not a social networking site, and definitely not a free speech forum.
• If you are disruptive in any way, particularly if you offer up any further legal threats (read Wikipedia:No legal threats and Wikipedia:Free speech, really), I will block all associated accounts and IP addresses, very possibly resulting in one of these.

I consider this offer is more than fair. If you're not willing to do this, I'm not willing to help you any further. And I won't stand in the way of anyone's potential futher adminstrative actions regarding this account. — Scientizzle 20:26, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Alright, I accept your offer of aid. I'd like to get on friendly terms with you. Here is my handshake on this issue. Wish I could really do it. I have, to disclose this account, RogueKnight77441, ESCStudent 774441, this acoount ForeverSearching and JusticeWithReason. The ones I used to evade the block were RogueKnigh774441, the IP from this computer, and my home IP address. ForeverSearching and JusticeWithReason were created to ask for forgiveness, and not meant to avoid the blocking law. I like you sir, and I would like to give my old account a chance to rehabilitate. Hope to see you again. If you would like to call me, I'll give you my home phone number. ForeverSearching (talk) 20:57, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Oh, the article you suggested is on a French issue I don't know much about. Think you could give me another one to try? ForeverSearching (talk) 20:59, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Replies here. IP unblocked, JusticeWithReason blocked & tagged, ForeverSearching labeled as legitimate alternate account. Now get editin'! — Scientizzle 21:29, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Ohrgan

I can prove it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Entroegahr (talk • contribs) 22:17, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Huh? Ohrgan? Deleted via Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ohrgan? Is that what you're talking about? — Scientizzle 22:52, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] X marks the WPOR COTW spot

Guten Tag WikiProject Oregon team members! Great job last week with the Collaboration of the Week, we improved George Lemuel Woods and added eleven new state park articles. This past week we also surpassed the 6000 article mark as a project. The weather may suck, but WPORE is not. For this week we have by request Music of Oregon and Phil Knight. Both need some help, and with Knight we might be able to improve it to GA standards. Once again, to opt out of these messages, leave your name here, or click here to make a suggestion. Aboutmovies (talk) 19:23, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] user nouse4aname

i reported this to another admind but thye havnet replyaed yet.... the user nouse4aname has undo my edit 4 times with the last 24 hours so to aviod an edit war and to aviod violating the 3rr rule, i stopped editing the page, however i put the edit war warning on his page and told him since he undo my eidts 4 times he violated the rule, he then removed it from the page to make himself look like he has a better history so i added it back just now and that is where we are. he has a nack for customizzing the pages to his likeing, he will follow one rule thne dis obey another if he doesnt like it, he has been nothing but an annoniance since he started edited the used page, since he violred the 3rr rule and removed the warning i think u shud give him a ban to teach him a lesson., i just checked and he removed the warning again so i will re add it again, the page he violted the 3rr on was shallow believer, he keeps removing the warning label from his page to make himself look good and he wont stop, he remove it and add it back but he wont let it stay there....he also stalks me on here and went to the other admins talk page to stand up for himself b4 the admin replyed to him so that shows he is just following every edit i make. here is his talk page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Nouse4aname#used USEDfan (talk) 20:49, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

You are very much hearing one side of the story. As he is an established user he doesn't need to keep seeing the template on his talk page. In addition, he has a right to remove it from his talk page per wp:DRC. --Bit Lordy (talk) 21:07, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

...I'm not sure why I was chosen to be informed about this. I do note, however, that both Nouse4aname (talk · contribs) & USEDfan (talk · contribs) have been blocked for edit warring. Given that there's a series of reversions of reversions of reversion between the two, seems like a good idea. I don't think there's anything for me to do here. — Scientizzle 21:36, 29 May 2008 (UTC)