Talk:Scientific evidence (law)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Scientific evidence (law) article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	Law Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.
???	This article has not yet received a quality rating on the assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received an importance assessment on the assessment scale.

[edit] Proposed move to scientific evidence (law)

Since this article deals with scientific evidence in the legal field, it is distinct from scientific evidence established in the practice of the scientific method. Therefore I propose moving the article title to Scientific evidence (law). --Blainster 05:34, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

I agree. takethemud 09:55, 23 April 2006 (UTC)takethemud

I agree. This is what legally qualifies as "scientific evidence", not what scientifically qualifies as evidence.--Zachblume 20:56, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

I have moved it--Zachblume 21:15, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Need for Edit

This article is sorely in need of major overhaul. It looks like somebody cut-and-pasted their noted from their Evidence class onto the Wiki, complete with abbreviations and the subjective observations of themselves or the professor. I will work on this when I get time.