Talk:Scientific American

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikipedian An individual covered by or significantly related to this article, Scientific American, has edited Wikipedia as
Scientific American (talk · contribs)


Any wonder that the editor who called this liberal political magazine [and no, "liberal political magazine" WAS NOT a joking reference, despite his editing] "one of the most respected science magazines in the world", on the strength of a blog citation, no less, is a self-described npr/cpb-ite and supporter of other leftist causes?

Any wonder wp has a reputation that's been described as "notoriously unreliable", among other things?

Answer: No, in both cases.

Thus, his revisions should be deleted.

D59g (talk) 15:25, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

considering how many wikipedians read this magazine, this article blows

Well the magazine blows!

I don't know what the term "blows" means, but I used to read SA many years ago in California in the days of Dr. Matrix and I found it to be informative and interesting (I am an electrical engineer). But when I tried it again several years ago all I found were diatribes against anyone who had the temerity to question evolution and it was not just once-in-a-while but continuously month after month. Instead of a general view of what was going on in the world of science it had become the Fox News of the science world, but in reverse. So, I gave it up after a year and will simply remain with my memories of what was once a fine magazine and which is not any more. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rcallen7 (talk • contribs) 16:23, 25 September 2007 (UTC)