User talk:Schnits
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello Schnits, welcome to Wikipedia.
You might find these links helpful: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too.
If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Wikipedia:Help desk or (if you want a broader audience) the village pump, or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
- You can introduce yourself on the new users page.
- You can find lots more information, including open tasks and daily tips, at the community portal.
- You can sign your name using four tildes, like this: ~~~~.
- Before saving a page, it's a good idea to use the Show preview button to review your edits. Also, consider writing a summary for each edit.
- The Tutorial is a great way to learn the basics in a more perspicuous fashion.
Again, welcome! Chris Roy 01:09, 3 May 2004 (UTC)
[edit] Penhold
Hi Nathan, do you release your Image:Sunset over Penhold.jpg into the public domain, license it thru Creative Commons, or is it just used with permission? Please respond at user_talk:zanimum. -- user:zanimum
- I've marked it on its page, so that everybody knows. There's a movement going on to make sure every image lists its source. -- user:zanimum
[edit] Democratic Socialism vs. Social Democracy
Social Democrats try to create a slightly more egalitarian society within the confines of Capitalism. Democratic Socialism tries to work within the confines of Capitalism, to eventually surpass it and create Socialism. Within these trends, there are of course rightist and leftis parties that are very different from the ideas of the whole. Hence, there is overlap, but they are still distinct traditions.--Che y Marijuana 04:52, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)
Indeed, while many of the current Social-Democratic parties arose out of Democratic Socialist parties, they are indeed different. Democratic Socialism is primarily associated with the Marxist (used loosely) parties of the Second International and their ideological heirs, whereas Social-Democrats tend not to buy into that communism jibber-jabber. Dig? --VMC
[edit] Images
Any images that you have taken yourself and uploaded are GFDL licensed per the terms on the upload page. I have updated the tags accordingly. If you do not wish to have your images GFDL licensed, you may ask for them to be deleted, though there is no guarantee that this will be done.
The Uninvited Co., Inc. 20:37, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Image:WAkaw April 9, 2004. Gpa birthday 022.jpg listed for deletion
Admrb♉ltz (T | C) 23:19, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] They're back
Please revert Saskatchewan Party if you have a chance. CJCurrie 23:50, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Please be very cautious with any reverts of Saskatchewan Party or similar articles, and please refer to Wikipedia:Conflict of interest since you have admitted on your Talk:Schnits page that you have 'canvassed and worked' for the Saskatchewan New Democratic Party in the past. CJCurrie's request of you is completely innappropriate.
64.110.251.69 05:05, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Due to any bias on my part that is why *I* cite anything I edit. Let me also indicate any NDP work I have done, was done for the Federal party, which is of a clearly different ideological stroke than it's provincial counterparts. -Schnits.
Your on the provincial youth wing of the NDP. Would that not count as work for the provincial NDP? Mknight1971 11:46, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Talk:Saskatchewan Party
Please remember to sign your posts on talk pages. Typing four tildes after your comment ( ~~~~ ) will insert a signature showing your username and a date/time stamp, which makes it clear who said what, and when. Thank you. Ardenn 05:18, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Loveatfirstbite.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Loveatfirstbite.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 02:14, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Saskatchewan WikiProject
Hello. A new WikiProject about Saskatchewan has been started as an attempt to better organize information in articles related to the province of Saskatchewan, Canada. If you would like to participate, you can Saskatchewan articles, add Saskatchewan content, or visit the project page, where you can join / edit the project and/or contribute to the discussion. WikiProject Saskatchewan
SriMesh|talk Julia 02:54, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
| WikiProject Saskatchewan Barnstar | ||
| WikiProject Saskatchewan barnstars are the official award for outstanding, extensive, high-quality, or generally valued contributions to WikiProject Saskatchewan Or they can be awarded by anyone, to anyone who has showed significant efforts to improve WikiProject Saskatchewan.
From your contributions, you have already written some awesome articles on Saskatchewan! SriMesh|talk Julia 02:54, 19 April 2007 (UTC) [edit] University of Saskatchewan Celebrate the Anniversary
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cover of CCF pamphlet.jpgThanks for uploading Image:Cover of CCF pamphlet.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:01, 13 February 2008 (UTC) [edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Leader Post Cover.jpgThanks for uploading Image:Leader Post Cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:01, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
|

