User talk:Schellack

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Tetsuya Wakuda (和久田哲也, ?) is a Japanese-born Australian chef based in Sydney, Australia. He is widely recognised as one of Australia’s most original, creative and successful culinary talents. His eponymous restaurant, Tetsuya’s, is celebrated both nationally and internationally.

Contents

[edit] Background

[edit] Early Life

Tetsuya Wakuda was born on June 18th 1959, in the city of Hamamatsu, in the Shizuoka prefecture of Japan. He trained for three years as chef in a large Tokyo hotel where he learnt the basic techniques of cooking both European and Japanese food.

A self-confessed “dreamer”, in his early twenties Wakuda decided he wanted to travel the world. Inspired by a documentary he watched about Australia, he made his first visit to the country at the age of 22 knowing little about the place other than believing it was full of koalas and kangaroos.

[edit] Kinsela’s and beyond (1983 – 1989)

In 1983, Wakuda met Sydney chef Tony Bilson (now head chef of the acclaimed Bilson's restaurant), who offered him a job cooking sushi at Kinsela’s in Taylor Square. Under Bilson, Wakuda learnt many of the classical French techniques that underpins much of Wakuda’s Japanese-French fusion cooking today. Perhaps even more importantly, Bilson was also the first to begin fostering Wakuda’s drive to discover new flavours that has become part of Wakuda’s culinary philosophy, by encouraging him to experiment during his time at Kinsela’s.

I started by doing some Japanese foodsushi etc – and then Tony gave me the chance to do other things. He basically told me to trust my instincts and to try mixtures. He taught me but also gave me the confidence and opportunity to test a lot.
-- Wakuda on Tony Bilson's influence

Wakuda left Kinsela’s in 1983, and together with one of the managers from Kinsela’s set up Rose’s nightclub, where Wakuda worked as a chef for a year. After leaving Rose’s, he was introduced to chef Hans Mohr through the late restaurateur Anders Ousback. He worked as second chef with Mohr for only six months but during that time “I learnt a lot from Hans”, Wakuda recalls.

After a short stint as head chef at Hunters Hill’s The Post and Whistle, Wakuda started Ultimo’s with a Kinsela’s head waiter Sean Dwyer in 1986. It was here that he began learning the responsibilities of operating a business. Two years later however his partner was forced to leave the business, and Wakuda decided to sell rather than take over due to the high rent and unsatisfactory location.

Wakuda turned his attention to starting a new restaurant of his own together with his wife. He chose a tiny shopfront in the suburb of Rozelle as the location.

[edit] Tetsuya's restaurant

[edit] Rozelle years (1989 – 2000)

The eponymous Tetsuya’s opened in 1989, an unassuming space with an upstairs room located on Darling St in Sydney’s Inner-West suburb of Rozelle.

In its humble beginnings, the restaurant’s tiny kitchen was run only by Wakuda and his wife, whom he trained to do the cold larder and dish presentation duties. The limited kitchen size forced Wakuda to make many compromises on the menu. The work too, was demanding for the duo, as Wakuda testified at the time:

There are two of us and we do 180 to 190 dishes a day – we have 44 covers, every one has at least four courses – it is a lot for two people.

Despite its limitations, the menu would change frequently and the restaurant enjoyed a steady stream of diners including many regular customers. One dish that remained a fixture on the menu was Wakuda's fish confit dish, which began life as a salmon dish but eventually evolved into using ocean trout.

Other dishes featured on the menu at the time included ‘boudin of pork and duck liver and pig’s trotters with port wine and mustard sauce’, ‘grilled breast of duck with duck sausage, sage, orange and ginger’ and ‘warm salad of fried marinated quail with rice and lemon vinaigrette’.

Over the years, the restaurant attracted favourable reviews, helping buoy the restaurant to new heights. In 1992 the influential Sydney Morning Herald Good Food Guide awarded the restaurant Three Hats - the highest possible rank, and a rank which the restaurant has been consistently been awarded each year since. Wrote one 1990’s GFG reviewer:

Tetsuya Wakuda is one of our most successful exponents of fusion cuisine, and the subtle Franco-Japanese creations […] are subtle, elegant, exquisitely balanced and in no way designed to draw attention to their creator.
-– The Sydney Morning Herald Good Food Guide

The restaurant was remodelled in 1993, increasing seats to 65, with an expanded and re-fitted kitchen. Kitchen staff eventually consisted of three chefs working alongside Wakuda as well as one or two kitchen hands, while up to four waiters manned the floor on fully booked nights.

Brimming with patronage - typically booked out weeks in advance - and now enjoying a reputation as a leading Sydney restaurant, in November 2000 Tetsuya’s moved to a larger, more glamourous location in Sydney’s CBD where it remains today.

[edit] Kent Street (2000 – present)

Tetsuya’s occupies a large, heritage-listed property on Kent St in Sydney’s CBD that once housed the former Suntory Restaurant. The restaurant seats 55 people, including private dining rooms and two larger main dining rooms overlooking a Japanese garden.

Many of the modern sculpture works displayed around the restaurant were made by his friend, the late sculptor Akio Makigawa. The ceramics used for plating some dishes, meanwhile, are made personally for Wakuda and the restaurant another friend Mitsuo Shoji.

As well as the food being ‘just right’, the aesthetics of the actual restaurant are also important to me. The dining experience should be one of visual as well as gastronomic pleasure
-- Wakuda on visual aesthetics

Upstairs, Tetsuya’s houses an experimental kitchen for Wakuda where new dishes are created, and old ones reworked.

Tetsuya’s originally offered an a la carte menu as well as a degustation option. This practice was eventually dropped however, and today only the degustation is offered. The restaurant is open six days a week for dinner, and also lunch on Saturdays.

[edit] Awards

Tetsuya’s continues to garner top awards and is internationally recognised as a leading Australian restaurant. The restaurant still maintains its Good Food Guide Three Hat status and was named Restaurant of the Year (again) in the 2008 edition. Tetsuya’s has also ranked within the top five “world’s best restaurants” as nominated by UK publication Restaurant magazine in 2005, 2006 and 2007.

[edit] License tagging for Image:Fugazi - Full Disclosure.ogg

Thanks for uploading Image:Fugazi - Full Disclosure.ogg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:06, 1 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Girls Against Boys - She's Lost Control.ogg

Thanks for uploading Image:Girls Against Boys - She's Lost Control.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:57, 13 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Girls Against Boys - Super-fire.ogg

Thanks for uploading Image:Girls Against Boys - Super-fire.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:58, 13 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Speedy deletion of Colditz Glider (band)

A tag has been placed on Colditz Glider (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. faithless (speak) 08:02, 16 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Rolling Stones - Brown Sugar.ogg

Thanks for uploading Image:The Rolling Stones - Brown Sugar.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:55, 26 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Rolling Stones - Gimme Shelter.ogg

Thanks for uploading Image:The Rolling Stones - Gimme Shelter.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:55, 26 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Girls Against Boys - She's Lost Control.ogg

Thanks for uploading Image:Girls Against Boys - She's Lost Control.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:38, 29 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Girls Against Boys - Super-fire.ogg

Thanks for uploading Image:Girls Against Boys - Super-fire.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:39, 29 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Rolling Stones - 19th Nervous Breakdown.ogg

Thanks for uploading Image:The Rolling Stones - 19th Nervous Breakdown.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:53, 3 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Rolling Stones - Brown Sugar.ogg

Thanks for uploading Image:The Rolling Stones - Brown Sugar.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:53, 3 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Rolling Stones - Paint It Black.ogg

Thanks for uploading Image:The Rolling Stones - Paint It Black.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:54, 3 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Rolling Stones - Satisfaction.ogg

Thanks for uploading Image:The Rolling Stones - Satisfaction.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:54, 3 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Rolling Stones - Street Fighting Man.ogg

Thanks for uploading Image:The Rolling Stones - Street Fighting Man.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair-use rationales

The rationales you're writing use generic phrases like "Enhances the article". What the bot's looking for is the exact name of the article, preferably in the form of a link. What the rest of us are looking for is a brief description of how it enhances the article. --Carnildo (talk) 09:47, 5 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Led Zeppelin - Black Dog.ogg

Thanks for uploading Image:Led Zeppelin - Black Dog.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:35, 5 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Led Zeppelin - D'Yer Mak'er.ogg

Thanks for uploading Image:Led Zeppelin - D'Yer Mak'er.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:35, 5 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Led Zeppelin - Dancing Days.ogg

Thanks for uploading Image:Led Zeppelin - Dancing Days.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:35, 5 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Led Zeppelin - No Quarter.ogg

Thanks for uploading Image:Led Zeppelin - No Quarter.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:36, 5 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Led Zeppelin - The Crunge.ogg

Thanks for uploading Image:Led Zeppelin - The Crunge.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:36, 5 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Led Zeppelin - The Ocean.ogg

Thanks for uploading Image:Led Zeppelin - The Ocean.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:37, 5 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Led Zeppelin - The Rain Song.ogg

Thanks for uploading Image:Led Zeppelin - The Rain Song.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:37, 5 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Led Zeppelin - The Song Remains the Same.ogg

Thanks for uploading Image:Led Zeppelin - The Song Remains the Same.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:38, 5 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Fugazi - Combination Lock.ogg

Thanks for uploading Image:Fugazi - Combination Lock.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:37, 22 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Fugazi - Full Disclosure.ogg

Thanks for uploading Image:Fugazi - Full Disclosure.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:37, 22 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Led Zeppelin - The Song Remains the Same.ogg

Thanks for uploading Image:Led Zeppelin - The Song Remains the Same.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Led Zeppelin - No Quarter.ogg

Thanks for uploading Image:Led Zeppelin - No Quarter.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:56, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Crostini Toscani.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Crostini Toscani.JPG. The copy called Image:Crostini Toscani.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 18:15, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Gigot (meat)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Gigot (meat), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Bfigura (talk) 01:39, 19 April 2008 (UTC)