Talk:Satyaputra
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. (add comments) |
 |
This article is maintained by the Indian history workgroup. |
 |
This article is maintained by the Tamil Nadu workgroup. |
|
More information about this article...
|
|
Factually incorrect While ashoka satyaputra is of the time 323 BC This article is trying to equate with king adhiyaman who lived in 2nd century AD
by jambai edicts.meghamitra 12:33, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Both the citations are not a verifiable and they need to be removed. The article
link which is below the citations cast doubts on the ashokan edicts period
without any conclusive evidence with just oral sources.
We need the original citation and periods verified by links before these are accepted as valid sources.
Jambai edicts are also tied to the period of irumporai refer edicts in pugalur, who defeated the adhiyaman. So firmly the period of 2nd century AD.
Ashokan edicts have been internationally verified for the periods. And satyaputra has been big dynasity then it could be verified by other historical sources. And avvyaar who has written glowing tributes to adhiyaman would have mentioned.
This is a friviolous theroy being propagated to advance the time of tamil sangam. Please remember the sangam litertature speaks about adhiyaman
Satyaputra mentioned in Ashokan edict mentions satvahanas. (230BC) Satyaputra in jambai edict mentions adhiyaman(2nd AD)
The article tries to link the two is scandalus.
The article doesnt have the proper citations. Also it tries to limit the Satyaputras into a small hill slopes, which is not yet proved. This is wrong information!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cool maddy (talk • contribs) 07:04, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
