From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Welcome
Hello, Sandeepriya! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking  or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Polly ( Parrot) 00:29, 5 February 2008 (UTC) |
|
Getting started
|
|
|
|
Getting help
|
|
|
|
Policies and guidelines
|
|
|
|
The community
|
|
|
Writing articles
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
|
|
|
[edit] February 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Your contributions are welcomed, however, one or more of the external links you added in this edit to World Heritage Site do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thanks. Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs) 00:49, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] India Heritage
India is rich in heritage and culture
[edit] Tracking data
- Domain
Google Adsense ID: 2009759205454141
- Accounts
--A. B. (talk) 15:41, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "Need to add great information about in articles. no futher addition to external links as i am building information to my site that would be great if i update the information at wiki articles too. please allow me to do so."
Decline reason: "This request for unblocking has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:
- Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
- Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
- Click edit this page on that article and scroll down past the message informing you of your block.
- Copy the source of that article and paste it to the bottom of your talk page under a new top-level heading (like this:
= Article title =)
- Propose some significant and well researched improvements to your article by editing your personal copy of the article.
- When are you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
- If we are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.
If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "
{{helpme|your question here}}" to your talk page. Thank you. —
Yamla (
talk) 23:34, 26 February 2008 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
{{helpme}}"
- I was about to help, but I guess you found out what you needed. If you have anymroe questions, feel free to re-add the {{helpme}}.--Sunny910910 (talk|Contributions|Guest) 00:07, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "original unblock reason"
Decline reason: "As per Irishguy's comments below. It looks like you haven't understood WP:NOR, WP:V, WP:RS, or WP:CITE, and probably not WP:NOT. Your addition is interesting and shows you have put in some time, but it's not quite ready for Wikipedia. Please read the policies I've linked to here and rework your contribution. To other admins, note that it is absolutely not unblock abuse for this user to rework his contributions to add reliable sources and then to re-request an unblock. — Yamla (User talk:Yamla) 15:39, 27 February 2008 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "original unblock reason"
Decline reason: "No reason given — Hu12 (talk) 21:37, 7 March 2008 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
{{Please review my work as allow me contribute to wikki.}}
{{helpme}}
An indef block with no warning? That seems a bit harsh. -- Ned Scott 05:52, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
- I think it may seem harsh. I have removed your helpme request - as it is an unblock request, so an administrator can help by looking at the unblock requests! --The Helpful One (Review) 15:25, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
-
Waiting — I have contacted the admin who assigned the task below. --slakr\ talk / 13:09, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, your changes still consist entirely of original research. There's still no evidence that you have read and understood our policies and guidelines such as WP:V, WP:RS, and WP:CITE. I am disappointed that even after pointing these out to you, you ignored them. Your unblock request is declined. --Yamla (talk) 14:28, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Comments
The section you added is completely unreferenced. Wikipedia doesn't accept original research. IrishGuy talk 03:18, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
