Talk:Sandoz
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] LSD
Research on LSD peaked in the 1950s and early 1960s.
- This is not true. It is more accurate to say that research became more difficult after drug prohibition. --Viriditas | Talk 18:56, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
[edit] "inventing" LSD
Could what Sandoz did be called "Inventing"? Inventing sounds like they thought "hey, it might be cool to design a hallucinogen" and deliberately created LSD for this purpose. This is not what happened, however. Sandoz was researching analeptics and accidentally stumbled upon LSD's psychological effects.I can't really think of a better word, though, so I'm asking for suggestions on how to make this more accurate.
- Also, I might add to this that Sandoz did not invent LSD, but Albert Hofman accidentally discovered LSD-25 through the study of ergot alkaloids. Albert also was accidentally exposed to this substance, which he relates in letters contained in the noteworthy autobiographical work by Hofman, My Problem Child. Here is a link to the wikipedia article about Hofman: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Hofmann -- it is clearly stated that Hofman found LSD-25 and it is through his discovery that LSD-25 was distributed by Sandoz, which might be one reason they had for hiring him. (-anonymous)
- Furthermore, LSD itself, as differentiated from the non-convulsive refinement LSD-25, was purportedly isolated and named by W. A. Jacobs and L. C. Craig of the Rockefeller Institute of New York. This is from the report of Albert Hofman, and I've no other way of verifying this presently. (-anonymous)
[edit] Saccharin
Why is it mentioned that saccharin was invented in 1899 without any supporting connection between saccharine and Sandoz?
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Sandozlogo.jpg
Image:Sandozlogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:24, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

