User talk:Sampackgregory

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Rozita Swinton

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Rozita Swinton, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Bfigura ^(talk) 03:24, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Please see our policy

To quote from WP:BLP1E: "If reliable sources only cover the person in the context of a particular event, then a separate biography is unlikely to be warranted." In general, this has been applied over a wide range of people, including prisoners at Gitmo. Unless the person is notable for something other than that one event, we generally try to place the coverage into the main article. Best, --Bfigura ^(talk) 03:45, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

That said, if the woman is actually notable for something else, than that would render this a moot point. --Bfigura ^(talk) 03:45, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] {{Runningback-1990s-stub}}

Hi - a stub template, category, or redirect which you created has been nominated for deletion or renaming at Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion. The stub type, which was not proposed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, does not meet the standard requirements for a stub type, either through being incorrectly named, ambiguously scoped, or through failure to meet standards relating to the current stub hierarchy or likely size, as explained at Wikipedia:Stub. Please feel free to make any comments at WP:SFD regarding this stub type, and in future, please consider proposing new stub types first! Grutness...wha? 04:16, 16 May 2008 (UTC)