Talk:Samir Azzouz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template. If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page. If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

This man was on trial for terrorism, he was not convicted. Because the case is brought to a higher court, he stays a suspect. In the Netherlands it is normal to not list the last name untill the suspect is convicted. That is the reason I moved the pagetitle.--Jeroenvrp 12:46, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Even on the Dutch Wikipedia, this is a subject of heated discussion. Why go with a convention from Dutch news media on an English encyclopedia? - Andre Engels 15:04, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Samir is known as Samir A in the Netherlands. He's still not convicted, so I removed the page to Samir A again. I think that even wikipedia has to follow the rules.

Well you actually only moved the talk page. We do not have to go by Dutch convention and I think it's much better to go by the full name. violet/riga (t) 15:32, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it to be moved. violet/riga (t) 15:32, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Even besides the question if this article should exist on a Wikipedia (does every suspected terrorist need to be described?), I think the ethical convention of the Dutch media should be the main course to follow for Dutch criminal suspects on every Wikipedia... Puck 18:21, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Why? Why should the Dutch media have any say in what goes outside of Holland?David Cannon 01:43, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)

It's seen as a protection of the privacy of suspects. The Dutch media believes that mentioning the full name of suspects may hurt them or their families after their release when they are innocent. I personally think it is a bit silly since the rise of the Internet, because every foreign media mentions the full name of suspects.