User talk:Saikano II

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

Hi

Hi, again, Saikano. I'm glad you're going to try again, but remember that you're on a short leash. If I see any of the behavior that led to your previous blocks you will be blocked indefinitely without warning. Please do not test our limits. Leebo T/C 01:09, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Blocked

Apparently you did not read my message above, or did not take me seriously. Your comments at Talk:Lolicon were exactly the kind of disruption you were blocked for before. I think I was optimistic to think you would stay away from lolicon/pedophile topics. Leebo T/C 14:45, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Blocked........

Lele? stop! You dod not say anything about lolicon! I read your thing and the only thing im aware of that that i was blocked for is Bitching on talk pages and lacking edits! Please rething your block! and for once WAIT for a good reason to block(Vandal, spaming, linking to B.S., blahing over nonthing, ect...) now unblock me so I can get back to my edit on chesapeake, VA and my favorate youtube thing Idol Master ok?!--Saikano II 15:07, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Leebo

Im sorry but...I cant stand this unfair treatment on this site! I told my family I love lolicon and they "litteraly" HATES ME and talks about my removal from my temporay living area! My friends have avoided me! My myspace fri...well I am unable to get to a Unfiltered Persocom so...

If Saikano provides a valid unblock request, the admin reviewing it can review his previous issues at Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Saikano and Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Saikano. Leebo T/C 16:26, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

OK leebo a valid reason? Fine! I wish to be unblocked so I can resume my duties as an editor on wikipedia! I Have edits prepared for:

Now if I do anything else disruptive I will retire from editing and cont. over on Wikiquote and Anime-wiki thing! Just tell me what I did disruptive and I will retire wiki style (The template thing)! I assure you I will do better than I did a year ago! Hell Im going to "Anger Management" classes this Saturday afternoon! Trust me when I say, "I am not a threat!"

Saikano, I used the word valid in response to the fact that you used the wrong unblock template. See the reason why it was declinded. Leebo T/C 17:25, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Aside form the sock puppet thing, you really have no "good" reason to block me! Its obv. I want to change its that I just need some help getting use to the rules! I can change and I want to change but w/ the constant blocks I just dont see that happening! For once trust me! Hell look here 2! *Sigh* I will make reasonable edits and avoid the crap that got me blocked before if not WP:BAN me!"

Decline reason: "Aside from the sockpuppet thing? The sockpuppet thing is sufficient to block this account indefinitely. Only the parent account may be considered for unblock consideration, not abusive sockpuppet accounts such as this one. You have clearly shown that you cannot change; if you could, you would not be continuing to violate policies such as WP:SOCK and WP:BLOCK. — Yamla 14:28, 12 September 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.