Talk:Sabine Hrechdakian

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Biography Portal
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

[edit] Notability

I think there's some question of notability here. Nareek 18:55, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

As far as I can glean from WP Policies, being a public figure is plenty enough reason to be included in the encyclopedia. Sabine may not be all that notable, but it's slogan time as is so common here: Arguments against deleting articles for non-notability matt kane's brain 19:08, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
I don't know that being a literary agent, the author of one book review or the former girlfriend of a dead musician in toto is enough to make you a public figure. It's hard to see how this article could ever be more than a stub, which I think is a good reason for deletion. Nareek 18:38, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
I agree and vote for deletion, although in Boston Sandman isn't simply a "dead musician". She isn't Yoko Ono, though. -Youspeakmylanguage
I've long heard of rumors that Sandman was homosexual. It's of historical interest to know that at the time of his death he was dating a woman. I have no idea, personally, whether he had homosexual tendencies of any sort, nor do I find it pertanent to his body of work, but I do think it's an interesting fact of note that he was either bisexual or heterosexual, but not homosexual. I'd vote to keep this article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.0.97.39 (talk) 14:40, 1 May 2007 (UTC).
Uh, we're going to have articles about people otherwise not notable (enough) just to provide hetero alibis for people? This is absurd. The article is pointless, and if Sandman's sexual orientation is notable (?) it should be discussed in the article about him. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.229.45.200 (talk) 05:01, 5 February 2008 (UTC)