User talk:Ryan/Archive 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Dude... What the...?!

Dude... It's the Wack Pack. How are wacky callers not relevant? How did I break the rules?! What is the deal? Do you listen to Stern? Do you know who Captain Cat F--ker is? I don't know if you're an appointed Wiki geek (no offense), but why are you reverting back the article??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ivand67 (talk • contribs) 00:16, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Huggle User Category

Hi there. I have seen that you use huggle by the fact that you have automatically updated the huggle white list(it does this when closing huggle). I was wondering if you would add the category [[Category:Wikipedians who use Huggle]] to your user page so that it fills out and we know who actually uses huggle. If you do not want to you do not have to. I am also sorry if i have already talked to you about this or you no longer use huggle but i sent it to everyone that has edited the page since mid January. I hope we can start to fill out this category. If you would like to reply to this message then please reply on my talk page as i will probably not check here again. Thanks. ·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 18:27, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Huggle Category Problem

Hi there.You are receiving this message from me as you have not added your huggle category correctly. At the moment on category here you can see that you are sorted under the letter U. To fix this please change the [[Category:Wikipedians who use Huggle]] to [[Category:Wikipedians who use Huggle|YOURNICKNAMEHERE]]. This will fix the problem. If you do not change this within a few days then i will do this for you but i would prefer to send you a message like this than just go and change your page. If you want to contact me then please use my talk page as i will not be checking back here. Thanks for your help. ·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 16:47, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Barnstar

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
While I was using huggle myself, I saw you reverting quite a bit of vandalism, so here you go. Keep up the good work, and may the vandals fail... J.delanoygabsadds 00:53, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Zora Neale Hurston

Hi, you left a note on my Talk page about my edits to Zora Neale Hurston being reverted by you. I'm glad you notified me so I could go back and see that I only undid one edit instead of reverting multiple ones. The changes made by my "undoing" looked completely reasonable and I thought that was the extent of the vandalism. But I suspect that you edited using a bot, because the changes resulting from your reversion were quite obviously wrong. For example, in your version, Zora's parents are "Micheal Jackson Hurston and Jessica Simpson Hurston" and her mother died in "2015" when Zora was "one hundred-thrity five". I have since reverted the article to what I believe is a good version, but I thought I should mention this to you in case you have a misbehaving bot. Mandarax (talk) 01:02, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] EDITS MADE

The edits were in response to those made by "BluAzur" regarding the articles images/formatting, which were neither productive, nor warranted, nor justified (ie. detail edit-summary ). Reverting to the prior version is both acceptable and appropriate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.158.136.204 (talk) 12:14, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] What the hell

How could you see my edit was unconstructive within 30 seconds of me making it, it was not destructive so I dont see how a bot could have picked it up, do you spend hour looking at talk: cheese all day long?

No im not going to pursue lol, I realise wikipedia is not a forum but I could not contain my opinion, I was only slightly worried for you and quite curious as how could anyone could pick up on something like that so quickly, now Im slightly less worried for you, I thank you for clearing up the results of this evil part of me, you are to me as a caretaker, who clears up the excrement of a child who not yet knows how to contain their bowles.86.133.101.176 (talk) 22:17, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Invite

 Please accept this invite to join the Red Sox WikiProject, a WikiProject dedicated to improving all articles associated with the Boston Red Sox. Simply click here to accept!

I noticed you like baseball.--RyRy5 Talk to RyRy 00:47, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

OK, and yes I did "steal" your old sig. I really liked it.--RyRy5 Talk to RyRy 00:13, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thank'ee

21655 ωhατ δo γoυ ωαητ? has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

For reverting the BS on my utalk. 21655 ωhατ δo γoυ ωαητ? 20:55, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:PAVCS Logo1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:PAVCS Logo1.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:07, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:PAVCS Logo1.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:PAVCS Logo1.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:03, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Editor Review

You've been doing quite a bit of vandal fighting today from a look at your contribs. Do you mind taking a break and review me? Just click "Review" in my sig.--Ryan (talk ♠ Review) 00:26, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

I just saw you on RC reverting. Are you going to review me?--Ryan (talk ♠ Review) 00:38, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. Good luck to you too.--Ryan (talk ♠ Review) 01:01, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thank you

Thanks for this κaτaʟavenoTC 00:25, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WP:AWB

Approved. Keep up the good work! --Rodhullandemu 00:10, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome Back

Greetings!

Welcome back my friend:-) How have you been? It is my hope you have been doing well. I actually have no clue what happened to Wikireligion. I heard someone else took over the project, but by now I've forgotten who. I would love to tell you, but I don't know myself:-( I haven't been active on any wiki since late November of 07. Have a nice day!--SJP (talk) 21:14, 31 May 2008 (UTC)