Talk:Russell Bishop
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This page is part of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
Yes I know we are nut supposed to have dab pages with only one entry. Now consider: your name is Russell Bishop, you are not a notable person but neither are you a sex offender. Top Google hit for your name says that you're a sex offender. Not good.
So we (the OTRS cabal and Jimbo) decided to make a dab page and do this thing, to make a hurt and upset person less hurt and upset. It costs us roughly nothing, does not degrade the encylopaedia and makes someone's life a little better. Guy (Help!) 14:41, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- What about Frank Houston, Geoffrey Prime, Bob Shell, Gabriel Williams, and the rest of the Category:Sex offenders tree. If this is the cabal & Jimbo direction, don't those need to be sanitized as well? -- JHunterJ (talk) 20:38, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
- No, it was a request from a member of the public who was coming under considerable strain. It was seen as a reasonable request and so it has been acted upon. No need for that tone. Woody (talk) 20:42, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
- There's no tone. I actually expected that the others would be sanitized too, if there's a cabal decision behind it. Here's another good candidate, in that an actual dab page can be created: William Jordan. -- JHunterJ (talk) 21:05, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
- No, it was a request from a member of the public who was coming under considerable strain. It was seen as a reasonable request and so it has been acted upon. No need for that tone. Woody (talk) 20:42, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
I created Russell Bishop (academic) for teh win -- the dab pages exists, and the dab page follows WP:D and WP:MOSDAB. I left a comment on that article to see this Talk for background, in case someone decides it should be deleted for notability. (I think cabals are a fine way to get things done, but one of the hazards of doing things in secret is that other people aren't aware of the reasons.) :-) -- JHunterJ (talk) 13:35, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
