From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Please do not deliberately introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Arsenal F.C.. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Qwghlm 10:34, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Stop creating short, nonsense articles now, please. Or articles which are less than factual. This may be your last warning before being blocked from editing. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 23:31, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
I have blocked you for a few hours, since you've continued to create some extremely dodgy looking pages which I don't believe a word of. My short block should probably be extended. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 23:39, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "I did not mean to cause so much annoyance (if that makes sense) and I would like to be serious in what I write in the future - I will only create a page talking about myself without being silly. I apologise for being stupid and immature, I was having a laugh and now i realise it was not at all funny. Please unblock me, if I annoy you again, warn me, if i continue being stupid you could block me forever if you wish. Thank you"
Decline reason: "Wikipedia is not a dumping ground for junk. —Centrx→talk • 04:55, 20 August 2006 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
- Um, no, sorry. I've indefinitely blocked this account, since it has contributed nothing but vandalism and hoaxes. Unless if you are notable yourself, we don't want a serious page talking about you either. Feel free and make a fresh start with a new name if you wish, after the autoblocks stop kicking in (24 hours from now). —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 00:07, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
- Note to unblock request reviewers -- a great number of this account's contribs were to now-deleted pages. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 00:08, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "can I appeal this block because it was a long time ago now and i seriously want to do some serious editing. I wont muck about or anything, if so just block me again if i do muck about, but i promise i wont"
Decline reason: "From what I recall you alreadu had another account, which since you are now reqeusting unblock on this one suggests that one worked out no better. No. --pgk 16:18, 14 October 2006 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
