Talk:Royal Peculiar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Christianity
Christianity Portal
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Assessment comments
WikiProject Anglicanism
Anglicanism Portal
Royal Peculiar is part of WikiProject Anglicanism, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.

Article Grading:
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.
WikiProject Anglicanism To-do:

Wolverhampton ceased to be a Royal Peculiar in 1846. I suspect that some of the others (added by an anonymous user) also have. --RFBailey 17:09, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

This shows how confusing the subject is; the diocesan page here shows Wolverhampton, and a few other places, as Royal Peculiars, and some ordinary Peculiars as well. Moonraker12 15:30, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Wimborne Minster did too according to their website. 195.92.43.117 13:43, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Why is this article at Royal Peculiar and not at royal peculiar? Is the capitalisation some kind of royalist peculiarity? If there is no good reason for it, naming conventions suggest that we should use the latter capitalisation. — Gareth Hughes 13:20, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Royal Peculiar (both capitalized) is the way it is in all the sources I've seen. Moonraker12 15:32, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

The listing of historic, but not current, peculiars has been eliminated.--82.43.116.249 11:04, 28 July 2007 (UTC)