Talk:Rotating Regional Primary System

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of the United States presidential elections WikiProject. This project provides a central approach to United States presidential elections-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

The National Association of Secretaries of State has endorsed this plan, it is one of the three most-mentioned plans out there. It is directly referenced in the literature for the American Plan itself. Multiple sources of verification have been added to this page.

Multiple external references and sources have been added. That should be sufficient, no? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.188.247.5 (talk) 17:49, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

The "one group" mentioned that supports this proposal is composed of the Secretaries of State of the 50 states. It is directly mentioned in the proposal for the American Plan. I have no idea how high the bar is for notability, but I'm certain that this reaches it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.179.163.175 (talk) 12:21, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] NH, IA Bias

I removed this crap: "Why should a new regional primary system, set up with a plan to rotate which region would go first, continue allowing these two states with strongly atypical demographics to have an undue influence in choosing America's president?"

This is not a forum, people. If you want to discuss this issue, don't discuss it here. -Laikalynx (talk) 20:19, 13 March 2008 (UTC)