Talk:Rondo (grape)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Requested move
- Rondo grape → Rondo (grape) – Article name is inconsistent with other grape variety articles — Ryandaum 01:52, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Voting
- Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
- Support per my comment below, almost all that require disambiguation use (grape) in the article's title --Lox (t,c) 10:25, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Discussion
- Add any additional comments
- Comment See Category:Grape varieties for a list of grape articles --Lox (t,c) 10:25, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
This discussion would mean that it should be moved, but since Regent grape was not moved... Mh. Any ideas? Leave it for now? —Nightstallion (?) 08:17, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
- Tricky situation! I am attempting to give an unbiased comment here, but my conclusion remains that this page should be moved, for this reason: Jiy's comment (largely valid!) opposed the block moved proposed at Talk:Regent grape, since his opinion is that the grapes listed are normally referred to as "Name grape" rather than just Name. This is not the case here, as a google search for Rondo grape -wikipedia vs "Rondo grape" -wikipedia shows.
- Even though this is an unobstructed move, I don't think it'd be appropriate for me to move this page, since the consensus at Talk:Regent grape was opposed. However, the arguments used there, at least in my opinion, do not hold. --Lox (t,c) 12:43, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
-
- Still, I'm afraid I'd rather not move for now. Is that okay for you? —Nightstallion (?) 09:42, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Okay. —Nightstallion (?) 20:58, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
- This is unfortunate, since it is only by error that I did not postfix the grape varietal name with (grape) when I created these articles. I would have moved it myself, but I was a new contributor at the time and the system would not let me. I did not mean for someone to come along and propose a mass move of the other varietals as well, though some, I would argue, should also be moved. My understanding is that most Wikipedia articles of this type use the (brackets) convention.Ryandaum 01:16, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-

