Talk:Ronald K. Hoeflin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ronald K. Hoeflin article.

Article policies
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

Please rate the article and, if you wish, leave comments here regarding your assessment or the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

WikiProject on Psychology
Portal
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, which collaborates on Psychology and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Article Grading: The article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

This article is part of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of education and education-related topics. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to featured and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.
Portal
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on July 21, 2006. The result of the discussion was Tentatively withdrawn conditional on cleanup.


Contents

[edit] Early comments

What is Hoeflin's own IQ? I think we should add that to the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.33.49.251 (talkcontribs) 19:01, 14 June 2006


  • This individual is self-published and not notable enough for a separate entry. Suggest merge to Mega Society. Comments? DaturaS 18:09, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

His Mega Test appeared in Omni magazine, and it was a big deal at the time. The Prometheus Society's journal, Gift of Fire, is up to 162 issues. Care to elaborate on why this entry should be deleted? Galizur 15:43, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

It makes no sense to me either. Make sure you register your views on the AfD raised against Ronald Hoeflin's article here. The Mega Society's deletion is being appealed here. --Michael C. Price talk 18:14, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
I'd have voted for keeping, maybe with cleanup and adding material. After all, much less significant material gets entries and many stubs get edited into something more substantial. (E.g. John de Courcy Ireland - I started the stub and others contributed.) Autarch 19:05, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Citation needed

I have marked up statements in the article that needed citations. The rest of the article seems well-sourced. If sources can't be found, those statements should be deleted, as per WP:CITE. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Obonicus (talkcontribs) 20:54:55, August 19, 2007 (UTC).