Talk:Ronald Bailey

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] Please rate the article and, if you wish, leave comments here regarding your assessment or the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

It is not neutral POV to list 4 (controversial) works authored by the subject of this article as the only additional sources.

Why are editorial comments aloowed in the "article " page - us nuts have plenty of space on the "discussion" page. Where is the goof from Reed College who runs this place - that should get him here. Lock the first page - let stupidity stay untouched - fight it out one this page. All Global Baloney, political, religious, holocaust, etc in particular. The fastest typing goof is dominating the intellectual? discussion, let's not let him get the article too. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 159.105.80.92 (talk • contribs) 13:40, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] ddt

Does anyone else have a problem with the sentence following Bailey's excerpted quote on DDT:

There is no evidence to support the claim that there was ever such a complete ban supported by the United Nations.

Bailey's quote does not claim that a complete ban was supported by the United Nations. It states that anti-DDT activists campaigned for a world-wide ban. If no one objects, I think this sentence should be deleted. Bobo81 (talk) 21:53, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Aaaaaand...done.Bobo81 (talk) 22:08, 4 December 2007 (UTC)