User talk:Rocksteadyman2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

Hello Rocksteadyman2! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! Grandmasterka
Getting Started
Getting your info out there
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Getting Help
Getting along
Getting technical

[edit] Lorraine Portraine

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Lorraine Portraine, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Importance). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Lorraine Portraine. If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fram 12:52, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Canada

Your recent edit to Canada (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot4 22:56, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Hollaback Girl. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Jkelly 22:57, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to No Doubt, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jkelly 22:59, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning for editing F-15 Eagle (diff). The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. // Tawkerbot4 22:59, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to No Doubt

Your recent edit to No Doubt (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 23:00, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Jkelly 23:01, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Krissy Ankus

An important message

Please be extremely careful when adding material to articles or talk pages that it does not involve defamation. Comments that defame an individual may leave you open to being sued by them. Your status here, whether as a signed-on user or as an anonymous IP, would not protect you. Someone you defame could get a court order instructing your service provider to supply your details to them. They could then sue you for damages. While Section 230 of the United States Communications Decency Act may protect Wikipedia from being sued for defamation, it may not protect the person who posted a defamatory claim on a Wikipedia page.

Furthermore, the Wikimedia Foundation's Board of Trustees has ruled that: Where the user has been vandalising articles or persistently behaving in a disruptive way, [personal information] data may be released to assist in the targeting of IP blocks, or to assist in the formulation of a complaint to relevant Internet Service Providers. (Wikimedia privacy policy in full)

This notice has been left for you because another Wikipedia user suspects that, perhaps innocently, you may have defamed someone in your contributions. Please recheck your edits. Do not make allegations against someone unless you have provided evidence from a reliable publication, and then make sure you describe the allegations in accordance with our content policies, particularly Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:No original research. Don't rely on hearsay, rumours, or things you believe without evidence to be facts, and don't use sources to create a novel narrative. Wikipedia requires reliable sources for all claims.

If you repeatedly defamed someone, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you find that you have inadvertently defamed someone in an article, do two things:

  1. Remove the defamation from the article immediately.
  2. Leave a note on the administrator's noticeboard saying that you have accidentally included defamatory claims in a named article or articles. (Don't repeat the claims. They will be able to see from your edit removing them what they were.) The claim will then be deleted from the page history.


Once that is done, and the defamation is gone completely from our records, the problem should be resolved.

Note that the above article has been deleted so you do not, in this case, need to do the two things above. Stifle (talk) 21:46, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Baltic Bakery

A tag has been placed on Baltic Bakery, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedia article. If you can indicate why Baltic Bakery is really not blatant advertising, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Baltic Bakery. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11 under General criteria. You might also want to read the guidelines on spam. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert why the article is not blatant advertising, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable. Leuko 02:16, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Food.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Food.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}. If you have not already done so, please also include the source of the image. In many cases this will be the website where you found it.

Please specify the copyright information and source on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jkelly 23:46, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Yummy

Do you have a reference confirming that "Yummy" will be the second single from The Sweet Escape? Velten

If you choose not to respond, the information in Wind It Up (Gwen Stefani song) will be removed. Velten 00:44, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:Yummy.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Yummy.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:09, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced controversial biographical information concerning living persons to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Akon. Thank you. --esanchez, Camp Lazlo fan! 02:40, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] YouTube links

Please stop. If you continue spamming Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. ShadowHalo 06:27, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] September 2007

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Bald Eagle. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policy for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. --əˈnongahy ♫Look What I've Done!♫ 16:11, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:Gwenbreakinupcover2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Gwenbreakinupcover2.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:05, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Baltic Bakery , you will be blocked from editing. — OcatecirT 06:39, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Wonderful_lidfe_amde.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Wonderful_lidfe_amde.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih (talk) 02:46, 1 January 2008 (UTC)