Talk:Rockdetector

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Its pledge is to give users unbiased, easy access to incorrect artist and product information"

Shouldn't that be correct product information? And should unbiased refer to the information and not to the access?

So this is nothing more than an advert for a web site. Why is it here when any time I add a link to a website with great interviews it is considered spam? No relevant info in this entry at all. Delete it.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.196.222.14 (talk • contribs)

If the article reads like an advert, clean it up. In your case, you should explain why The Internet Archives is a reliable source. –Pomte 02:32, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for the advice. Should be obvious though, first hand interviews done exclusively for the site/author whereas thei rock Detector thingy is largely pilford from other content providors. The "author" stole much of his work on the Black Sabbath book from a book called, "None More Black" the Story of Black Sabbath 1980 to the Present." Should we add these references and explainations? Thanks again.