User talk:Rob101abc
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] December 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Acid rain, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Acid rain was changed by Rob101abc (c) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2007-12-17T09:26:33+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 09:26, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] G Holland
Hello. You may not remove speedy deletion tags from pages which you have created yourself, as you did with G Holland. If you want to contest the deletion request, place the {{holdon}} tag right below the deletion tag, and explain your reasoning on the article's talk page. ~ | twsx | talkcont | 09:55, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] In response to your question on the deleted article's talk page:
how else do you start a page without it being deleted, such as Sony Xbox etc.? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rob101abc (talk • contribs)
- Notability plays a major role for product or company articles. Well-known products or companies (for example, the ones you mentioned, the company Sony and the product Xbox) bring a lot of reliable, independent sources that establish their notability. Smaller companies are often not notable to the public discourse, and therefor no such sources can be found, which means failure to prove notability, which again means the company or product might not be suitable for an own article on wikipedia. ~ | twsx | talkcont | 10:03, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] May 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Chav has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. treelo talk 09:53, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
