Talk:Robert E. Jones (Illinois)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Politics and government work group.
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.
WikiProject Illinois This article is part of WikiProject Illinois, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on January 13, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

[edit] Attack page?

I tagged this page as {{db-attack}} for four minutes and then reverted myself. Besides the introductory statement, the nicest thing that has been said about this person is "Former Mayor Jones still opperates a Dairy Queen in the summer". Every other edit has involved labelling him as the "reigning champion of dick sucking," etc. The Dairy Queen comment may very well be nonsense as well, so I ask: was this page really meant to be an encyclopedic article on this man, or an example of humorous libel? -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 00:09, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Deletion

I tagged this for discussion pending deletion because: 1) It doesn't have any level of prominence outside of its venue; 2) The scope of the article is too small, and; 3) The article contains too little information to be of any use. Demossmw 23:16, 13 January 2007 (UTC)