From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
|
Robert Baker Aitken was a good article nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these are addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Reviewed version: January 28, 2008
|
| This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard. |
 |
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. Please participate by editing the article Robert Baker Aitken, or visit the project page for more details on the projects.
|
| Start |
This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. |
| ??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
|
Article Grading:
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.
|
[edit] Categorizing
Note: I removed this article from Category:Zen Buddhist monks and priests and put it in Category:Zen and Category:Buddhists instead. This is because, unless, I'm wrong, Aitken is layman, not ordained. I believe that this is the only article that needs to removed from the new category for this reason. - Nat Krause(Talk!) 19:30, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
- GA review (see here for criteria)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS): 
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR): 
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused): 
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Parts of this article read more like hagiography than biography. Are there any critics or criticisms of his teachings?
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:

- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Are there any images which could be used for this article? A GA should have at least some images.
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
