Robber baron (industrialist)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

John D. Rockefeller Sr., American capitalist, painting by:John Singer Sargent, 1917
John D. Rockefeller Sr., American capitalist, painting by:John Singer Sargent, 1917

Robber baron was a term revived in the 19th century in the United States as a pejorative reference to businessmen and bankers who dominated their respective industries and amassed huge personal fortunes, typically as a direct result of pursuing various anti-competitive or unfair business practices. The term may now be used in relation to any businessman or banker who is perceived to have used questionable business practices or scams in order to become powerful or wealthy.

The term derives from the medieval German lords who illegally charged exorbitant tolls against ships traversing the Rhine river (see robber baron). There has been some dispute over the term's origin and use. It was popularized by U.S. political and economic commentator Matthew Josephson during The Great Depression in a 1934 book. He attributed its first use to an 1880 anti-monopoly pamphlet in which Kansas farmers applied the term to railroad magnates. The informal term captains of industry may sometimes be used to avoid the negative connotations of "robber baron".

[edit] Historiography

Appearing in literature during the late 19th century,[1] the Robber Baron thesis was popular until the 1940s. Matthew Josephson's the Robber Barons gave the term its most enduring expression.[2] The theme had much popularity during the Great Depression as there was widespread public scorn against business enterprise.

But by the end of the Great Depression though, other historians, notably Allan Nevins, began advocating the "Industrial Statesman" thesis. Nevins, in his John D. Rockefeller: The Heroic Age of American Enterpris (2 vols., 1940), took on Josephson directly. He argued that while Rockefeller may have engaged in unethical and illegal business practices, this should not overshadow his greater contribution of bringing order to the industrial chaos of the day. Gilded Age capitalists, according to Nevins, sought to impose their will for order and stability on the competitive business environment. Their work ultimately made the United States the foremost economy by the twentieth century.[3]

The whole Robber-Baron-or-Industrial-Statesman debate was sidestepped by Alfred D. Chandler in his Visible Hand (1977). There Chandler contended that the business of industrializing America was a historical process and not a morality play of good versus evil. As he later expressed, "What could be less likely to produce useful generalizations than a debate over vaguely defined moral issues based on unexamined ideological assumptions and presuppositions?"[4]

[edit] Businessmen considered Robber Barons

[edit] References

  1. ^ Howe, Maud (1886). Atalanta in the South. Boston: Roberts Brothers. Retrieved on 2008-01-24. “New York, that den of robber-barons, keeps the bulk of the wealth of the country as a species of giant playthings...” 
  2. ^ Matthew Josephson, The Robber Barons: The Great American Capitalists, 1861-1901, New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company, 1934.
  3. ^ Allan Nevins, John D. Rockefeller: The Heroic Age of American Enterprise, 2 vols., New York, C. Scribner’s sons, 1940.
  4. ^ Alfred D. Chandler, "Comparative Business History," in D. C. Coleman and Peter Mathias, eds., Enterprise and History (Cambridge, 1984), 7; On Chandler's other accomplishments in this book, see Richard R. John, "Elaborations, Revisions, Dissents: Alfred D. Chandler, Jr.'s, The Visible Hand after Twenty Years," Business History Review, 71, no. 2 (Summer 1997): 151-200.
Languages