User talk:Rlendog

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Rlendog, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

Also, I made some modifications to your edits to the howler articles. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:02, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] commons

[edit] Project Templates

  • {{WikiProject Central America}}
  • {{Fishproject}}
  • {{WikiProject aquarium fishes}}
  • {{PrimateTalk}}
  • {{AfricaProject}}
  • {{Baseball-WikiProject}}
  • {{MaTalk}}
  • {{MaMTalk}}
  • {{Mammal}}

[edit] Stub Templates

  • {{CentralAm-stub}}
  • {{CostaRica-stub}}
  • {{CostaRica-geo-stub}}
  • {{CostaRica-protected-area-stub}}
  • {{Panama-stub}}
  • {{Panama-bio-stub}}
  • {{Panama-geo-stub}}
  • {{Belize-stub}}
  • {{cichlidae-stub}}
  • {{baseball-bio-stub}}
  • {{primate-stub}}
  • {{mammal-stub}}

[edit] citation templates

[edit] vandalism tempplates

  • {{subst:uw-vandalism1}}
  • {{subst:uw-vandalism2}}

[edit] Page Count Tool?

a page count tool

[edit] Springsteen song articles

I see that you're creating a bunch of articles for Springsteen songs. Please note that per WP:SONGS and WP:Notability (music), not all songs warrant articles, and there are many admins and editors out there who will try to delete them. Singles will survive, so "Fade Away" is okay, but run-of-the-mill album tracks like "Ramrod" probably will not. Only album tracks that are especially notable or famous or an example of his work will be viewed as warranting articles, so for example "The River" will be okay. But obscurities like "Be True" are likely to get junked. Just want to keep you from doing work that gets lost ... Wasted Time R (talk) 15:06, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Doctor Who newsletter, March 2008

The Space-Time Telegraph
The WikiProject Doctor Who newsletter
Issue 1 March 2008
Project News
We have five new participants: Sm9800, Seanor3, T saston, Type 40, Jammy0002.
One editor has left the project: StuartDD.
The Doctor Who portal has expanded to increase the number of selected stories to 33.
Articles of note
New featured articles
None
New featured article candidates
New good articles
Delisted articles
None
Proposals
A proposal for changing the layout of the episode pages is under way here.
A discussion about the formatting of the cast lists in episode pages is under way here.
A discussion to move United Nations Intelligence Taskforce to UNIT is under way here.
News
The Torchwood project has become a task-force under the project's scope.
The Torchwood series 2 finale airs on 4th April, and the 4th series of Doctor Who will start to air on 5th April.

For the Doctor Who project, Sceptre (talk) 19:16, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
You have received this letter because you are on the newsletter recipients list. To opt-out, please remove your name.

[edit] "new" sportive lemurs

Why not Louis, Jr, 2006 for the authority? Look at sportive lemur's ** note. He's the primary author. - UtherSRG (talk) 01:48, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Sorry about that. I thought I had left that as a stray reference when I copied the taxobox. I restored the references to Louis.Rlendog (talk) 02:01, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Ok. Also, they should be in Category:Prosimians. - UtherSRG (talk) 02:15, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] marsupial lion

In regards to "nor are many going to be aware that Marsupial Lion and Marsupial lion are necessarily two different things", but they are not two different things. As of yet everyone has failed to defend the keeping of marsupial lion as a redirect to "Thylacoleonidae". They always defend it by saying "marsupial lions" which I have already pointed out is already redirected to it, or as Uther said "marsupial lion family". There are not other species deserving the common name "Marsupial Lion", T.carnifex is the largest species of the so called "marsupial lions" and is the most deserving of the name. In fact if it were not for this species I doubt the common name "marsupial lions" would have even come about to describe the family. By the way, I am curious to find out exactly how you came about this page? Cazique (talk) 05:49, 6 June 2008 (UTC)