Talk:Ring Magazine pound for pound

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of WikiProject Boxing, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to boxing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

Contents

[edit] David Haye 29012008

He is not on The Ring Magazine P4P list, Bernard Hopkins should be here. Someone is vandalising Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.146.32.62 (talk) 14:19, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

I have fixed it, this can be confirmed on The Ring Magazine website. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.146.32.62 (talk) 14:23, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] A female listing?

I saw on a recent telecast that Ring Magazine evidentally has a female pound for pound listing. Although I never read it in the magazine or seen it in the website. Maya Levy 02:32, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Manny Pacquiao as of 12/06

Manny Pacquiao after his win on November 18, 2006 against Erik Morales jumped to #2. Whomever is editing him to #1 is clearly vandalizing the page. Maya Levy 04:50, 20 December 2006 (UTC)


floyd mayweather is still #1 p4p in the ring ratings and Manny pacquiao just moved from #3 to #2. Pacquiao has never been #1 and this needs to be fixed asap!!!! (user: william u. 11:14pm, December 26,2006

why is manny pacquiao #1. by putting him their you are giving improper information and hurting the integrity of wikipedia as a whole. all you have to do is go to the ring online and look at the rankings. floyd mayweather has been #1 since june 2005 and still remains their. i know the individuals of wikipedia have a little more common sense then what their showing. (i'm sorry maybe you are ignorant and i shouldn't be so harsh on you.) get it right!!!

I think Ocsar De La Hoya has to be in there somewhere I am a boxer myself and I think he is classy, and great to watch.

Please keep in mind that this is not a Wikipedia Pound for Pound page. Maya Levy talk 13:34, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Historical Number 1 list

It would be interesting to see a historical #1 list - all the fighters that used to be considered the best pound-for-pound. GregorB (talk) 00:23, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Changes

Please wait until The Ring update their rankings before changing the order. [1] still lists Hopkins at #4 and Calzaghe at #5. Neıl 12:22, 21 April 2008 (UTC)