Talk:Ring Magazine pound for pound
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] David Haye 29012008
He is not on The Ring Magazine P4P list, Bernard Hopkins should be here. Someone is vandalising Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.146.32.62 (talk) 14:19, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
I have fixed it, this can be confirmed on The Ring Magazine website. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.146.32.62 (talk) 14:23, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] A female listing?
I saw on a recent telecast that Ring Magazine evidentally has a female pound for pound listing. Although I never read it in the magazine or seen it in the website. Maya Levy 02:32, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Manny Pacquiao as of 12/06
Manny Pacquiao after his win on November 18, 2006 against Erik Morales jumped to #2. Whomever is editing him to #1 is clearly vandalizing the page. Maya Levy 04:50, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
floyd mayweather is still #1 p4p in the ring ratings and Manny pacquiao just moved from #3 to #2. Pacquiao has never been #1 and this needs to be fixed asap!!!! (user: william u. 11:14pm, December 26,2006
why is manny pacquiao #1. by putting him their you are giving improper information and hurting the integrity of wikipedia as a whole. all you have to do is go to the ring online and look at the rankings. floyd mayweather has been #1 since june 2005 and still remains their. i know the individuals of wikipedia have a little more common sense then what their showing. (i'm sorry maybe you are ignorant and i shouldn't be so harsh on you.) get it right!!!
I think Ocsar De La Hoya has to be in there somewhere I am a boxer myself and I think he is classy, and great to watch.
Please keep in mind that this is not a Wikipedia Pound for Pound page. Maya Levy talk 13:34, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Historical Number 1 list
It would be interesting to see a historical #1 list - all the fighters that used to be considered the best pound-for-pound. GregorB (talk) 00:23, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Changes
Please wait until The Ring update their rankings before changing the order. [1] still lists Hopkins at #4 and Calzaghe at #5. Neıl ☎ 12:22, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

