Talk:Right-handedness

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Right-handedness article.

Article policies

Contents

[edit] Right Handed List

There should be a list of famous right-handers like there's one of lefties and ambis, otherwise it's unfair. --203.173.8.12 02:28, 12 September 2005 (UTC)

Why is not a big deal to be right-handed, yet so many people make a hype about left-handedness? Right-handedness is assumed to be more common, but on Wikipedia (ironically enough) it looks like there are more left-handed people than right-handed. In the end, I guess being right-handed is less common than left-handed. Polarizing effect. -Lehla This is one of the stupidest statements I have ever heard, Lehla! How stupid can you be to say that. To provide a semi-complete list of all the right-handed people would take up terabytes of server space!


THAT MADE SENSE!!! --Deleted the famous list... absolutely stupid. There are so many people who are right handed (90+ percent of the population) that it makes no sense to have such a list.

Obviously - I assumed the post of 203.173.8.12 02:28, 12 September 2005 (UTC) was a joke. It's like having a list of heterosexuals, or a list of all the people who have not won academy awards or who have not been convicted of war crimes.suck this dick biotche!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Why is the left-handed article longer than the right-handed one??? 154.20.186.68 03:59, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

dunno, i would have thought they both would be equal indepth of information and length.. if we checked the authors hand usage i bet most of them are left handers.. the way i read the left-handed article is as left handed people have superhuman powers like the mutants in the x-men and right handed people are the average joe with neaderthal like minds. maybe we should segregate left and right handers, maybe we should teach our children to hate and distrust people who use the opposite hand as themselves... haha stupid, people are stupid.. 75.15.247.159 21:46, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] But Why, Oh Why?!

The article states that 90% of people are right-handed, but doesn't go on to explain why this trait seems to be dominant...

Andreala 16:02, 23 January 2006 (UTC)hay

[edit] No Proof?

"Many people deem right-handed people to be "intellectually challenged" though there is no proof of this." If there is no proof of this statement, then I think it should be removed from the page. Also, this article really needs to be expanded! Have you seen the article of left-handed people?!

[edit] Article

I'll have a decent go at this tomorrow. The idea of fairness make me laugh. It's an encyclopedia article, not a game of snakes and ladders. It's a bit like saying if you're going to make a list of all the monarchs of England, you should make a list of all the people who have never been monarchs of England. If you have a list of left-handed, right-handed and cross-dominant people then you basically have a list of all the people in the world. Spectacularly pointless.

I'll try and dig up some research but basically there is almost zero chance of getting a common consensus.

Mglovesfun 00:09, 16 August 2006 (UTC)


[edit] German

I've found the link for a definition or Rechts (right) in german, but I can't understand it well enough to put it on this page : Here is the link you're looking for.

Mglovesfun

[edit] Theories explaining handedness

I notice that the theories explaining right-hand dominance are on the handedness page, the left-handed page and not the right-handed page. Because it's so well written, it's tempting to just copy and paste the whole thing here, but then you end up with the same section on three different pages. And yet, apart from omitting the whole section all together, what else can we do? If anything, a separate page of 'theories of handedness' might be better, to which all three articles could refer to

Mglovesfun 15:56, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] section redirected

see Talk:Left-handed#Theories_explaining_handedness

[edit] 2007-02-9 Automated pywikipediabot message

This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary.
The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.)

Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary.

Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there.

--CopyToWiktionaryBot 04:09, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Right Handed?

If you are right handed then consider adding this to your page.

This user is right-handed.

DJSEDISTICAL 20:21, 13 May 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Use in science

How about some info on use of the term in science/engineering, such as right-handed screws and right-handed coordinate systems? I came to this article from relative direction where the term right-handed coordinate system is used. Rb82 09:47, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit]  ???

Why would you need a list of right handed people their are so many of ya, you wouldnt feel like reading it anyway!

[edit] Warrior Theory

WTF? Sorry, but that sounds retarded to me. It is true that a good proportion of the male breeding population would have gone to war in early times, but this only explains the suppression of that gene at the time. Surely by the time that the world's leaders began using dedicated armies, this would have ceased to be such a strong effect? Or by the time gunpowder was invented? This doesn't seem to address the lack of left-handed people in the 21st century. Or else I'm being stupid and don't get it somehow Sir Elderberry 02:26, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] In the left/right footed and ocular sentence

Would someone please clarify this first sentence with regards to the statement alone being obvious and that it was probably supposed to say something about the foot? "Right handed people have been known to not be left handed".-- 65.116.202.2 (talk) 17:01, 16 November 2007 (UTC)Joe Haugen 11/16/07