User talk:Rickyar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] License tagging for Image:Wartnes.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Wartnes.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:10, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Wartnes.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Wartnes.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BigDT 01:32, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:Wartnes2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Wartnes2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:29, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Candida Tobin

I've declined to speedy the article. COI alone is not sufficient for speedy, and neither is unreferenced, or even a sound suspicion that the person isnt notable. According to WP:CSD, its only for articles where there is no assertion that the person is important, and the material in the article is a claim to importance. Before you nominate it for afd, you might want to check whether there are in fact references to support notability--if so you would be better to add them. Deletion is the last resort. DGG (talk) 19:48, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Tanglewood Symposium

I spotted this unsourced article & I noticed you'd given the edit summary "needs work" So I tagged it "underconstruction" so it would hopefully be protected for a little while at least. I notices it because I'm interested in trying to develop articles for more such symposia in various academic fields, and they are often challenged. There seems no real consensus about these articles, but the thought at recent afds seems to be that series of symposia might be notable, but it would take a great deal to justify an article on an individual one. Good luck with it. DGG (talk) 22:36, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] content difficulties

There is no really good way to handle this, but the following are the usual steps, first, asking for sources that it's a widely used method--and if appropriate challenging them on the RS noticeboard. Then,asking for a WP:THIRD opinion, or if necessary at RfC on the article. See WP:DISPUTE. DGG (talk) 18:56, 14 August 2007 (UTC)