User talk:Rick brade
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello there!
Congratulations on your first article. It's pretty good for a first attempt!
I've removed the 'comment' parts, because remember wikipedia is always live - so comments in the text are a no-no. Please put comments in the discussion page, not the article.
I'll take a further look at the article, and make more comments later.
For now, though;
Welcome...
Hello, Rick brade, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Chzz ► 10:48, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Further edits
Hi,
Normally, I wouldn't explain all the little edits I've done, but it sounded like you'd want to know, so;
I've changed "Related" to "See also";
Changed External links and See also to sections, rather than the bold heading you used, y using ==heading==
Removed some <br> - you hardly ever need to use them in WP, just put a blank line in
Reversed the order of 'External links' and 'See also' - it's a convention to have 'external' last
Added a 'references' section, ready to display the refs that need adding
Also, note that it's often a good idea to create the article in a Sandbox first, so you can play around with editing before it goes 'live'.
If you do have any questions, just ask.
Cheers, -- Chzz ► 10:59, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
In other tinkering, I removed " that will be necessary to preserve the strength of the American economy for posterity" because it's not very WP:NPOV. I think you might run into problems if you're not careful about NPOV, so please have a good read of that - and also WP:COI.
-- Chzz ► 11:08, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
I suggest you change "almost two dozen cities" to the actual number, if you know it or can find out. "almost two dozen cities" sounds a bit promotional. "23 cities" sounds nice and factual - thus encyclopaedic.

