User talk:Richtom80/Archive Jun 2007
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Your offer at Template talk:WPSchools
Is your offer to remake the school image still open? Adam McCormick 17:47, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, not a problem, how would you like the image improved or recreated? Richard Thompson (Talk! | Contribs) 13:33, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
-
- Ok I'd personally prefer that the image be improved so that it looks cleaner rather than completely redone, it still needs to be recognizable as a school at 50px Adam McCormick 18:05, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- I have made a new image, almost identical to the original Image:School.svg
New image is: Image:New_School.svg and looks like
Is that more like what you want? Richard Thompson (Talk! | Contribs) 11:20, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
- I have made a new image, almost identical to the original Image:School.svg
-
-
-
-
- That looks great, my only other request would be to trim the extra space around the image so that the sizes line up. Otherwise that's great, much better than what we have now, is there anything else you would want to add? Adam McCormick 18:10, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Nope, as long as you are happy with it. I have now trimmed the white space to fit better, although on my machine the rendering of the small image looks a bit funny, it maybe cached and need reloading let me know if it does the same on yours and I will try to fix it. Richard Thompson (Talk! | Contribs) 09:05, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
- Looks good, I'm moving it to the template Adam McCormick 02:46, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- Nope, as long as you are happy with it. I have now trimmed the white space to fit better, although on my machine the rendering of the small image looks a bit funny, it maybe cached and need reloading let me know if it does the same on yours and I will try to fix it. Richard Thompson (Talk! | Contribs) 09:05, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
[edit] Infobox
I notice you added the "infobox UK places" to "Northfleet" a while back. The latitude/longitude top-line feature that it generates clashes with the standard {coor title...} feature appended to the script. Presumably the latter is used in Wikipedia's global database of locations. Clearly one or the other has to go. What's the policy on this? . . .LinguisticDemographer 16:04, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
- I am not sure to be honest, I added the info box as was a "to do" on the Northfleet article. If you look at articles like Gravesend there is no coor title just the info box coordinates. Richard Thompson (Talk! | Contribs) 09:13, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

