Talk:Richie Barnett

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Biography Portal
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.
NEW! Task force on State of Origin NEW!
Want to help improve Rugby league articles? Join WikiProject Rugby league
WikiProject Rugby league The article on Richie Barnett is supported by the WikiProject on Rugby League, which is to improve the quality and coverage of rugby league related articles on Wikipedia.
If you wish this article to be re-assessed, go to our Assessment Department and add it to the list.
If you wish this article to be peer-reviewed, go to our Peer Review Department and add it to the list.
If you rated this article you may want to leave some comments here on how the article can be improved.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the quality scale.
High This article has been rated as high-importance on the importance scale.
Richie Barnett was automatically assessed as stub because it uses a stub template
If you agree with this, edit the page and remove the auto=yes parameter.
Richie Barnett was automatically assessed as having no infobox by a bot.
If you agree with this, edit the page and remove the autotemplate=yes parameter.
Flag
Portal
 Richie Barnett is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Assessment comments


Some joker has tagged the article. Was fine, plus someone has now fleshed out the article. Londo06 12:15, 15 August 2007 (UTC)