Talk:Richard Hawes

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Richard Hawes is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do.
	Richard Hawes is part of the "Confederate government of Kentucky" series (project page), a featured topic identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do.
Article milestones Date Process Result July 4, 2007 Good article nominee Listed July 18, 2007 WikiProject peer review Reviewed August 25, 2007 Featured article candidate Promoted September 28, 2007 Featured topic candidate Promoted Current Status: Featured article

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
FA	This article has been rated as FA-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Politics and government work group.
More information about this article... This article has had a peer review by the Biography WikiProject, which has now been archived.

	Kentucky Portal Richard Hawes is within the scope of WikiProject Kentucky, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Kentucky and related subjects in the Wikipedia. Template Usage • Change Patrol • Articles Requested! • Become a Member • Project Talk
FA	This article has been rated as FA-Class on the Project's quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as mid-importance on the Project's importance scale.
	Please explain ratings on the ratings summary page.

The following user(s) are actively contributing to this article and may be able to help with questions about verification and sources: Acdixon (talk • contribs • email) HiB2Bornot2B (talk • contribs • email) This in no way implies article ownership; all editors are encouraged to contribute.

[edit] GA pass

This is an excellent article, well written and without fault - the references are great. The article is definately GA and IMO is FA. I would suggest an FA run as I think the prose, the references, the information, the images are all beyond GA level. Well done. Sorry I cant find anything to improve. I do recommend an FA run. Well done! LordHarris 00:23, 11 July 2007 (UTC)